[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject: Re: RFR: 8168479: Backout the changes for JDK-8168478
From: "serguei.spitsyn () oracle ! com" <serguei ! spitsyn () oracle ! com>
Date: 2016-10-21 19:42:51
Message-ID: bd8889c3-4401-b36d-a261-52e40565a49f () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Alexander,
Reviewed.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 10/21/16 06:25, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thank you very much for the review/ I've changed the CR title.
>
> Waiting for a (R)eviwer to approve this trivial one-line quarantine.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dmitry.dmitriev@oracle.com
> To: alexander.kulyakhtin@oracle.com
> Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:21:02 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8168479: Backout the changes for JDK-8168478
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> can you please change bug title to "Quarantine AllModulesCommandTest.java test". \
> The change looks good.
> Dmitry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: alexander.kulyakhtin@oracle.com
> To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:10:41 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: RFR: 8168479: Backout the changes for JDK-8168478
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you, please, review this trivial change (quarantining a test).
>
> CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168479 "Backout the changes for \
> JDK-8168478"
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8168479/
>
> The test is being quarantining due to \
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168478 "JDWP: canRead() reports false for \
> reading from the same module 'java.base'" (same as the previously unreproducible \
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166289)
> On the SQE side we do not currently see any issues with the test itself.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic