[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR(M): JDK-8141070 vm/services/management.cpp should be resilient to missing 'jdk.management' m
From:       Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fuchs () oracle ! com>
Date:       2016-01-15 13:38:40
Message-ID: 5698F660.3040605 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Dmitry,

This is still not clear to me why java.lang.management and 
sun.management are handled differently - since they are in
the same module.

best regards

-- daniel

On 14/01/16 15:49, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Daniel,
>> >OK. What of the sun.* implementation classes in java.management?
>> >Should these be REQUIRED as well?
> java.management module might be missing. It's the main goal to the fix -
> provide a way to handle missing java.management module on VM level.
>
> i.e.
>
> if java.lang.management is missing, VM fails with NCDFE.
>
> if java.management is missing, implementation of particular function can
> do something to handle it.
>
> -Dmitry
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]