[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR 6471769: Error: assert(_cur_stack_depth == count_frames(), "cur_stack_depth out of sync")
From:       "serguei.spitsyn () oracle ! com" <serguei ! spitsyn () oracle ! com>
Date:       2014-02-26 2:11:10
Message-ID: 530D4D3E.3030707 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks, Christian!
Serguei

On 2/25/14 5:55 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:43 PM, serguei.spitsyn@oracle.com wrote:
>
>> Please, review the fix for:
>>   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6471769
>>
>>
>> Open webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/hotspot/6471769-JVMTI-DEPTH.1
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>>   This is another Test Stabilization issue.
>>   The fix is very similar to other JVMTI stabilization fixes.
>>   It is to use safepoints for updating the PopFrame data instead of relying on the
>>   suspend equivalent condition mechanism (JvmtiEnv::is_thread_fully_suspended())
>>   which is not adequate from the reliability point of view.
>>
>> Testing:
>>   In progress: nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi, nsk.jdwp, JTreg com/sun/jdi
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]