[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject: Re: Review Request: 7140852: Add test for 7022100
From: Coleen Phillimore <coleen.phillimore () oracle ! com>
Date: 2013-01-31 23:15:08
Message-ID: 510AFAFC.2010808 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Stefan,
I just read through this test and it looks like a good test to me (but
I'm not an expert and it took a while to figure out how it worked). I
had two questions. Why does the same definition for @interface
ParameterAnnotation {} appear in both
RedefineMethodWithAnnotationTarget*.java files? Can't it be in it's
own file and just once? Or is it different (didn't see any differences).
Also is do_redefine supposed to be doRedefine as per Java coding
convention or is that a known variation?
Thanks,
Coleen
On 01/22/2013 09:39 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/7140852/webrev.00/
>
> This test provoked the bug in:
> 7022100: Method annotations are incorrectly set when redefining classes
>
> thanks,
> StefanK
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic