[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-quality-discuss
Subject:    Re: Code Coverage
From:       Steve Poole <spoole () linux ! vnet ! ibm ! com>
Date:       2013-05-28 22:28:20
Message-ID: 1C91515E-B577-477D-8FC9-D1F4F6C7F382 () linux ! vnet ! ibm ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

hi Pavel  - this is great news.  There are many people who are interested in the \
results of this  sort of analysis so  it would be very good if you could publish your \
first set of data as soon as possible - even if its a "one-off download the zip" \
style process.



On 28 May 2013, at 18:29, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pavel,
> 
> As part of Betterrev we'll be providing some public hosting, we're still a few \
> weeks from going live, but it shouldn't be too far away.  We could then provide a \
> place to host these results on that server. 
> Cheers,
> Martijn
> 
> 
> On 28 May 2013 13:55, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> ----- Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> > 
> > That would be fantastic. The place we're combining all the workflow for
> > submitting patches to OpenJDK is the Betterrev project -->
> > https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev.  Also see
> > adoptopenjdk.java.net for the mailing list and IRC details.
> > 
> 
> Hi Martijn,
> 
> thank you very much for the info mentioned above.
> What should I do to present Mauve code coverage results somewhere publicly
> available?
> 
> Cheers,
> Pavel
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> > 
> > 
> > On 24 May 2013 16:37, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Richard,
> > > 
> > > FYI: we are running many form of tests against OpenJDK internally in Red
> > > Hat.
> > > ATM our focus is to improve especially Mauve tests to have better coverage
> > > of all Java SE API classes.
> > > I'm also measuring test code coverage using JaCoCo and my own JVM TI based
> > > tool which is
> > > able to check code coverage on basic classes (where JaCoCo can't be used).
> > > All results
> > > are generated in HTML form + some graphs etc. etc.
> > > 
> > > It would be perfect to have one (public) place to publish those results,
> > > so it would be nice to cooperate on this topic if you want to :)
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Pavel Tisnovsky
> > > Red Hat
> > > 
> 
> 


[Attachment #3 (unknown)]

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html \
charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: \
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">hi Pavel &nbsp;- this is great news. \
&nbsp;There are many people who are interested in the results of this &nbsp;sort of \
analysis so&nbsp;&nbsp;it would be very good if you could publish your first set of \
data as soon as possible - even if its a "one-off download the zip" style \
process.<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On 28 May 2013, at 18:29, \
Martijn Verburg &lt;<a \
href="mailto:martijnverburg@gmail.com">martijnverburg@gmail.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div \
dir="ltr">Hi Pavel,<div><br></div><div style="">As part of Betterrev we'll be \
providing some public hosting, we're still a few weeks from going live, but it \
shouldn't be too far away. &nbsp;We could then provide a place to host these results \
on that server.</div> </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br \
clear="all"><div>Cheers,<br>Martijn</div> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 28 May \
2013 13:55, Pavel Tisnovsky <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ptisnovs@redhat.com" \
target="_blank">ptisnovs@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="im"><br>
----- Martijn Verburg &lt;<a \
href="mailto:martijnverburg@gmail.com">martijnverburg@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br> \
&gt; Hi Pavel,<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; That would be fantastic. The place we're combining all the workflow for<br>
&gt; submitting patches to OpenJDK is the Betterrev project --&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev" \
target="_blank">https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev</a>. &nbsp;Also see<br> \
&gt; <a href="http://adoptopenjdk.java.net/" \
target="_blank">adoptopenjdk.java.net</a> for the mailing list and IRC details.<br> \
&gt;<br> <br>
</div>Hi Martijn,<br>
<br>
thank you very much for the info mentioned above.<br>
What should I do to present Mauve code coverage results somewhere publicly<br>
available?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Pavel<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
&gt; Cheers,<br>
&gt; Martijn<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On 24 May 2013 16:37, Pavel Tisnovsky &lt;<a \
href="mailto:ptisnovs@redhat.com">ptisnovs@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Hi Richard,<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; FYI: we are running many form of tests against OpenJDK internally in \
Red<br> &gt; &gt; Hat.<br>
&gt; &gt; ATM our focus is to improve especially Mauve tests to have better \
coverage<br> &gt; &gt; of all Java SE API classes.<br>
&gt; &gt; I'm also measuring test code coverage using JaCoCo and my own JVM TI \
based<br> &gt; &gt; tool which is<br>
&gt; &gt; able to check code coverage on basic classes (where JaCoCo can't be \
used).<br> &gt; &gt; All results<br>
&gt; &gt; are generated in HTML form + some graphs etc. etc.<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; It would be perfect to have one (public) place to publish those \
results,<br> &gt; &gt; so it would be nice to cooperate on this topic if you want to \
:)<br> &gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Cheers,<br>
&gt; &gt; Pavel Tisnovsky<br>
&gt; &gt; Red Hat<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic