[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not sup
From:       Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth () oracle ! com>
Date:       2020-01-29 12:24:08
Message-ID: 6ed49ec2-223c-200b-91aa-b85b8e07431a () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Rony,

The RFE you filed is now available here:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238080

-- Kevin


On 1/25/2020 6:32 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 24.01.2020 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why you didn't get an
>> email at that time, but I will inquire of the team who processes incoming bugs.
>>
>> Also, I'll keep an eye out for the RFE you filed today, and let you know when it is transferred in
>> case there is still a problem with the notification.
> thank you very much!
>
> ---rony
>
>
>> On 1/22/2020 9:52 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>> Hi Anthony,
>>>
>>> On 22.01.2020 17:07, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote:
>>>> Your issue has been converted into a JDK issue, with your testcase attached [1].
>>> Thank you *very* much for this information!
>>>
>>>> Normally you should’ve received an e-mail at the time of this conversion,
>>> Just searched all my e-mail folders and could not find it (looking for "FXMLLoader" in the subject
>>> of e-mails as the bug title contains that word) but could not find a matching e-mail for whatever
>>> reasons.
>>>
>>>> but you can check this yourself by using the internal review ID as in [2]. If you’d like to
>>>> contribute a fix, see [3].
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>> Kind regards, Anthony
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234959
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234959>
>>>>
>>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JI-9062887
>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JI-9062887>
>>>>
>>>> [3] https://github.com/openjdk/jfx <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx>
>>>>
>>> Thank you also for these links (and I learned something new on how to check for it using the
>>> internal review id with your [2], thanks a lot for this hint as well)!
>>>
>>> Will go back and study all the necessary procedures (forgot a lot since reading them the last time)
>>> and will try to contribute the fix in the proper way but it may take me a little while (currently
>>> quite busy around here).
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Maybe one more question: there would be an optimization possible by compiling scripts for script
>>> engines that have the javax.script.Compilable interface implemented and use the compiled version to
>>> execute/evaluate the scripts (may be helpful for event handler code e.g. for onMouseMove event
>>> handlers). Can the fix include such an optimization or should there be a separate discussion/RFE for
>>> it beforehand? (Adding this would be trivial in the context of the fix, however the bug description
>>> would not hint at such an optimization.)
>>>
>>> ---rony

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]