[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: Will there be update of openjfx-8u?
From:       Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg () gmail ! com>
Date:       2019-06-25 16:43:51
Message-ID: CAP7YuASZaBj5JHbpky6fbY_zBYjcNOe=PqiqrbsY91v1RDNFgA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

THanks, Kevin, and my apologies for not reading the archives

Cheers,
Martijn


On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 18:32, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth@oracle.com>
wrote:

> As mentioned in this message [1], the last release of OpenJFX 8 was
> 8u202 in January 2019, in conjunction with the last Oracle-led OpenJDK
> release of the same. You can see the 8u202-ga tag [2] in the openjfx 8u
> repo.
>
> -- Kevin
>
> [1]
>
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2019-January/023039.html
> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u/rt/tags
>
> On 6/17/2019 4:03 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > Out of curiosity - what was the last release of OpenJFX 8? If I'm reading
> > the repos correctly it should be 8u60?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:01, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@bestsolution.at>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Kevin,
> >>
> >> Well isn't that true as well for jfx-12 - or is this maintained? What
> >> makes jfx-12 different from jfx-8? Or is the plan to remove jfx-12 once
> >> jfx-13 is released, ...?
> >>
> >> Anyways, I accept this and I'll see how I can get that forked to my own
> >> github account (once I have a need for it :-)
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On 11.06.19 13:55, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> >>> If someone wants to create a new project and fork the openjfx/8u-dev/rt
> >>> repo there, that would be fine...as long as everyone understand that it
> >>> is a fork of an unmaintained code base.
> >>>
> >>> Since openjfx/8u is not being maintained, neither the
> >>> javafxports/openjdk-jfx repo nor the new (for project Skara) openjdk
> >>> project on GitHub would be suitable.
> >>>
> >>> -- Kevin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 6/11/2019 3:25 AM, Tom Schindl wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> What I asked some time ago is that the github fork also contains the
> >>>> latest u8-state before it got frozen - similar to eg jfx-11, jfx-12
> (and
> >>>> most likely soon jfx-13 branch).
> >>>>
> >>>> This would at least give us all a central place we can create our
> forks
> >>>> on (I understand nobody is willing to maintain merge back changes
> >> there).
> >>>> Tom
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10.06.19 22:29, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> >>>>> I recommend that you upgrade to JDK 12 + openjfx 12 if you want to
> keep
> >>>>> current, since openjfx-8u is not supported.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you must stay on JDK 8, Oracle is supporting JavaFX in JDK 8
> through
> >>>>> March of 2022 [1], so you could check into that (note that this list
> is
> >>>>> not the place to discuss support, however). Otherwise, you are on
> >>>>> your own.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Kevin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6/9/2019 7:52 PM, guoge (A) wrote:
> >>>>>> Thanks for your reply, Kevin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I wonder to know if I'm still using JDK8 with JFX8 because JFX 11
> can
> >>>>>> not match with JDK8 (as I know),
> >>>>>> How can I deal with the vulnerabilities of JFX8?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Guo Ge
> >> --
> >> Tom Schindl, CTO
> >> BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
> >> Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7. A-6020 Innsbruck
> >> Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
> >>
>
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]