[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: building webkit
From:       Tom Schindl <tom.schindl () bestsolution ! at>
Date:       2018-08-25 19:03:05
Message-ID: 8532BEC0-7EC2-43C0-B902-0696450393BF () bestsolution ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

I think in the longrun using the adoptjdk approch is the one to follow.

Tom

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 25.08.2018 um 19:01 schrieb Arunprasad Rajkumar \
> <arunprasad.rajkumar@oracle.com>: 
> As Kevin mentioned, I tried to make WebKit build work on Travis with few \
> hacks(using ccache). It seemed to be working, but not consistently all the time. 
> > How does AdoptJDK solve problems of long build times? Can we not adopt
> > their build chain/infrastructure?
> 
> Looks like they host their own CI infra without relying on Travis/Appveyor.
> 
> > On 25-Aug-2018, at 6:34 PM, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@bestsolution.at> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > How does AdoptJDK solve problems of long build times? Can we not adopt
> > their build chain/infrastructure?
> > 
> > Tom
> > 
> > > On 25.08.18 15:00, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> > > Yes, this should be possible to do. Even without build changes, we could
> > > build just the SDK + WebKit (and maybe media, too, or maybe a separate
> > > job for that). The problem is that even building just WebKit takes
> > > longer than Travis / Appveyor will allow. See PR #121 [1]. Arun can
> > > comment further.
> > > 
> > > Irrespective of the above, as long as a compatible SDK (meaning an SDK
> > > built from the current tip of jfx-dev/rt) is available for download, the
> > > build can point to it, and will use the jfxwebkit and media natives from
> > > that build. So if we had a nightly build available, most developers
> > > could use that (it wouldn't help anyone making native changes to WebKit,
> > > but would be fine for most developers who don't).
> > > 
> > > -- Kevin
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/121
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > On 8/25/2018 12:27 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
> > > > We currently don't build WebKit with Appveyor/Travis, as the combined
> > > > build
> > > > time would be too long.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm wondering though if it would be possible to have separate build jobs
> > > > for webkit? Typically, when building a JavaFX SDK, the webkit part is
> > > > where
> > > > things go wrong (if they go wrong), and have that somehow automated would
> > > > be very helpful.
> > > > 
> > > > - Johan
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Tom Schindl, CTO
> > BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
> > Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7. A-6020 Innsbruck
> > Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]