[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: Monocle Headless BufferOverflowException (Issue + Fix)
From:       Michael Ennen <mike.ennen () gmail ! com>
Date:       2018-02-24 3:37:29
Message-ID: CAOTPd65msFOmmgW_9gtx3VgWXqXx=9iY4jgUYC-sSdi2+yMFtw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

From my limited testing, the issue is still present in 8u172 b03 (early
access)
and 9.0.1+11 (that is, assuming it is the same bug which I am crossing my
fingers
about!).

Thanks for taking this back up, John.

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth@oracle.com
> wrote:

>
> In general, what should we do when we find bugs in version 8 but the
>> latest development is happening on version 11? Open the bug, or test it
>> against the latest version first?
>>
>
> The latter is preferable if it is possible to test it on the latest
> version.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> John Neffenger wrote:
>
>> On 02/23/2018 02:29 PM, Michael Ennen wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the issue:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/openjfxepd/jfxpatch/issues/1
>>>
>>> Thanks to John Neffenger for taking the time to put this together! I
>>> wanted to make this work was known to Kevin and the team.
>>>
>>
>> I'm so glad you found it! I posted a link to the issue, along with two
>> others, on this mailing list a year ago, but I think people were too busy
>> with all the Java 9 changes happening at the time (rightfully so).
>>
>> I was reluctant to open the official bugs on the Oracle page before
>> testing whether they still occur in the latest version. Actually, I haven't
>> even had the time to check whether they still occur in the latest OpenJFX 8.
>>
>> In general, what should we do when we find bugs in version 8 but the
>> latest development is happening on version 11? Open the bug, or test it
>> against the latest version first?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>


-- 
Michael Ennen
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]