[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: WebView and WebGL
From:       Scott Palmer <swpalmer () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-08-26 13:46:06
Message-ID: 38ED8BFC-C134-48C9-8D6F-D385987E5181 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

+1

... to Any high performance way to get images from native code to the screen in a \
JavaFX app.  I filed an enhancement request many years ago for a method to supply \
portions of the media pipeline for the media player APIs. 

I've also been asking for some way to get at a native surface context. Be it DirectX, \
OpenGL, Metal,... even just a native window handle.


Scott

> On Aug 26, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Sten Nordstrom <stnordstrom@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael, all,
> 
> Just want to state my support for Michael's "Direct backed WritableImage".
> Having a way to do natively-backed rendering is IMO the most important
> feature still missing from FX. This is an area where QT is still way ahead
> with it's OpenGL/OpenGL ES integration.
> 
> Having something like a direct-WritableImage implementation would also make
> it easier to implement a video viewer using native decoder libs. Personally
> I find this approach much more powerful than the existing FX 3D and media
> streaming features, which are (especially 3D) limited in their
> capabilities.
> 
> I will be at JavaOne this year, so if there is any interest in meeting up
> and talking JavaFX I'm in!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sten Nordström
> 
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 at 22.41 Michael Hoffer <info@michaelhoffer.de> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jonathan, hi all,
> > 
> > I would like to bring up the "WritableImage backed by DirectBuffer"
> > discussion again:
> > 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]