[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: Regression or feature: editable comboBox doesn't commit on focus lost
From:       Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth () oracle ! com>
Date:       2015-09-23 20:01:04
Message-ID: 56030500.6050301 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Since this is a serious regression I see no barrier to backporting it to 
8u-dev. Presuming that happens before late October, then it would make 
the 8u72 release (mid-January).

-- Kevin


David Gilbert wrote:
> I ran into exactly this issue today, it would be great to see it fixed in a release \
> soon. 
> Best regards,
> 
> David Gilbert
> http://www.jfree.org/
> 
> 
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:21, fastegal@swingempire.de wrote:
> 
> 
> > Thanks for the info and filing an issue :-)
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Jeanette
> > 
> > Zitat von Leif Samuelsson <leif.samuelsson@oracle.com>:
> > 
> > 
> > > This is a regression in 8u60. I have filed a new issue for this and I hope that \
> > > we can backport a fix to an 8u release. 
> > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136838
> > > 
> > > Leif
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 2015-09-21 06:38, fastegal@swingempire.de wrote:
> > > 
> > > > short description (for a complete description and a workaround see \
> > > > http://stackoverflow.com/q/32620739/203657): 
> > > > edit the text in an editable comboBox, focus another control - expected: the \
> > > > edited text is committed (aka: combo's value changed), actual: combo's value \
> > > > unchanged 
> > > > Worked as expected in u45 (and supposedly u51 which I don't have on my \
> > > > machine) - intentional change or regression? 
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Jeanette
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]