[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: Off topic: named parameters
From:       dalibor topic <dalibor.topic () oracle ! com>
Date:       2015-05-20 14:34:23
Message-ID: 555C9B6F.7030607 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 14.05.2015 23:53, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> But I did expect someone to respond on the handing in of the
> JEP, mainly based on quotes like this: "/We use the current JEP Process
> to collect, review, sort, and evaluate proposals for enhancements to the
> JDK. The ongoing result of this process is the JDK Roadmap, a collection
> of feature ideas and other proposals for consideration by JDK Release
> Projects and related efforts./" But after your explanation and rereading
> the JEP 1 and 2 it seems real life is different from the mental image
> that this quote puts in my head.

Yeah, JEPs != feature wishlists. General RFEs should go to bugs.java.com.

If you read a bit further at 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html

you'll notice that is says

"Any Committer to a Project may propose to target a Feature JEP to a 
release of that Project after documenting a realistic engineering plan."

cheers,
dalibor topic

-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

Oracle | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]