[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Re: JavaFX Builders, possible solution
From:       Stephen F Northover <steve.x.northover () oracle ! com>
Date:       2013-10-30 13:32:15
Message-ID: 52710A5F.7020601 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Andy,

It is unlikely that we will undeprecate the builders but more likely 
that we could make them available as a separate download so that people 
that wanted to use them could still use them.

Martin will follow up with you.  Essentially, we would accept changes 
that were backward compatible to the deprecated builders.jar that we 
make right now, but we are not interested in taking the builder code 
base forward ourselves at this time.

Steve

On 2013-10-30 8:25 AM, Lesley Perkins wrote:
> In case it wasn't clear, I'm submitting this to the JavaFX team in hopes that we \
> can UNdeprecate the builders in Java 9.  Is this a possibility? 
> --Andy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openjfx-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net \
>                 [mailto:openjfx-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lesley \
>                 Perkins
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 8:00 PM
> To: 'openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net'
> Subject: JavaFX Builders, possible solution
> 
> I briefly discussed the builder deprecation with Richard when he visited our \
> company back in May.  One of the ways he said to test any solution would be to \
> build a library jar with the test hierarchy, then build a client jar using the \
> library jar, then change the hierarchy in the library code and run the client jar \
> against the new library jar without re-compiling the client jar. 
> I have done that, and it works in my simple test:
> 
> BuilderLibA - is the "original" builder library (my version)
> BuilderClient - is the client app (main class is \
> com.cpex.javafx.test.BuilderClientTest), built against the BuilderLibA.jar. \
> BuilderLibB - I have inserted a new class in the hierarchy between \
> RegionBuilderBase and ParentBuilderBase. 
> I had tested the solution in both JDK 7 and JDK 8, a few months back, and then \
> forgot about it as several other things came up.  All of the code has been uploaded \
> to DropBox: 
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fs8o105bvmr4s2k/ze-hJssiHC
> 
> If there is something else that I'm missing in this issue let me know...I really \
> hate to see builders go away. 
> --Andy
> 
> This message may contain confidential information and is intended for specific \
> recipients unless explicitly noted otherwise. If you have reason to believe you are \
> not an intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. \
> This message may not represent the opinion of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (ICE), \
> its subsidiaries or affiliates, and does not constitute a contract or guarantee. \
> Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and the recipient of this message is \
> expected to provide safeguards from viruses and pursue alternate means of \
> communication where privacy or a binding message is desired. 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]