[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-openjfx-dev
Subject:    Review request for RT-19228
From:       Richard.Bair () oracle ! com (Richard Bair)
Date:       2012-03-30 23:15:24
Message-ID: A58D6BF9-6208-4279-AE9A-0243D73823C8 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> So a builder might be a good way to address this particular issue. However, I don't \
> think that using a builder here necessarily invalidates the fx:constant concept. \
> FXML currently lacks a standard way to refer to constants, and I think fx:constant \
> would be a nice, consistent way to do it.

I agree, in the issue report I listed 4 potential approaches that all seemed \
reasonable and not mutually exclusive, and this is one of the solutions.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]