[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-jdk8-dev
Subject:    Re: Next Protocol Negotiation TLS Extension
From:       Brad Wetmore <bradford.wetmore () oracle ! com>
Date:       2013-03-25 21:26:03
Message-ID: 5150C0EB.6030208 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]



On 3/25/2013 6:59 AM, Simone Bordet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Brad Wetmore
> <bradford.wetmore@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simone,
>>
>> I haven't looked at the proposal yet, but just from a scheduling point of
>> view, unfortunately we're finishing up the implementation of the last of the
>> planned features for JDK 8, so getting this into 8 is likely not possible.
>
> "Likely not possible" means "totally impossible" or "if you do this
> and that, then it's possible" ? :)

I would never say "totally impossible," but closer to "totally 
impossible" than "likely not possible."

> Do you know the status of JEP 114 ? Will it be shipped in JDK 8 ?

That is still the expectation.  We had to pull 114 temporarily because 
of a conflict in two projects, and we'll be working on resolving the 
merge when the engineer is back from vacation.

     http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8009925

>> We have an open bug for this (JDK-8007785) and it's on the radar for JDK 9.
>
> Ok, if impossible I will eventually pop up again when JDK 8 is
> released and JDK 9 work started.

Planning for JDK 9's features will start well before that.  Some of the 
dev work will already be underway by release.

Brad


> Thanks !
>
> --
> Simone Bordet
> http://bordet.blogspot.com
> ---
> Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are,
> to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability,
> the implementation technique must be flawless.   Victoria Livschitz
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]