[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-jdk7u-dev
Subject:    Re: Fwd: Re: <i18n dev> [7u10] Request for approval: 7174233: Openjdk is missing some key maps on th
From:       Naoto Sato <naoto.sato () oracle ! com>
Date:       2013-01-31 6:31:09
Message-ID: 510A0FAD.1020501 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Please also provide a regression test along with the fix. Thanks.

Naoto

On 1/30/13 6:08 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
> Hi Naoto,
>    Thank you.
>
> To Sean,
>    Could you please shed your light or anything I can do?
>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
> On 1/31/2013 3:15 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> OK, I am fine with backporting the fix. Please go ahead.
>>
>> Naoto
>>
>> On 1/29/13 9:34 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
>>> Hi Naoto and Sean
>>>    I think we can verify it in Japanese environment.
>>>    The reason for backporting is that it's quite safe to do and also
>>> would be better if the defect is fixed in JDK 7 also.  Please let me
>>> know if there is any idea.  Thank you.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Frank
>>>> While I think fix looks good (that's why I approved the change in
>>>> jdk8),
>>>> I don't find any reason for backporting this change into 7u line. Is
>>>> there any strong reason for backport?
>>>>
>>>> Naoto
>>>>
>>>> On 9/18/12 10:37 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>> > cc'ing i18n-dev alias here also. i18n fixes can be difficult to test.
>>>> > Was it possible to verify this fix on jdk7u Shi Jun ?
>>>> >
>>>> > Any thoughts from i18n reviewers on this one being backported to 7u ?
>>>> >
>>>> > regards,
>>>> > Sean.
>>>> >
>>>> > On 17/09/2012 08:07, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
>>>> >> Hi all,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into
>>>> 7u10.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Changeset in jdk8
>>>> >>http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/6694d9e99716
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Webrev
>>>> >>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhangshj/jdk7u/7174233/webrev.00/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Reviewed by anthony, naoto
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Review thread
>>>> >>http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-June/002919.html
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]