[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-jdk6-dev
Subject:    Re: [backport] Fix shared vm code to allow zero build
From:       Jiri Vanek <jvanek () redhat ! com>
Date:       2013-11-07 9:26:13
Message-ID: 527B5CB5.3020901 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/07/2013 06:34 AM, Alex Kasko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/05/2013 06:35 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I would like to offer two backports:
>> Originally I found them:
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea7-forest-2.4/hotspot/rev/af221c82682c
>>
>> and
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea7-forest-2.4/hotspot/rev/b732355257e3
>>
>>
>> and after testing and adaptation I  used them in rpmbuilds of jdk6 with
>> zero:
>> http://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/jdk6/type_hsx23_patch4.patch
>> and
>> http://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/jdk6/type_hsx23_patch3.patch
>>
>> With them zero builds and works fine, without, it do not even compile.
>>
>> Afaik both were pushed also to icedtea6
>>
>> Are there any objections against them?
>> if not, I will prepare webrev (or somebody of you may directly push)
>>
>
> Just want to confirm that windows builds of jdk6 work fine with this patch.
>
> In type_hsx23_patch3.patch methodLiveness.cpp I modified "size_t" to "uintptr_t" to let patch apply
> cleanly on top of jdk6.

Thats interesting, I had to modify it vice versa...
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Jiri Vanek
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]