[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openjdk-hotspot-runtime-dev
Subject: Re: [CAUTION] RE: RFR(xxs): 8241395: Factor out platform independent code for os::xxx_memory_special
From: "Schmidt, Lutz" <lutz.schmidt () sap ! com>
Date: 2020-03-24 19:52:09
Message-ID: 4F2864B5-80DE-497D-9276-467D46A8ACFA () sap ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Perfect.
Thank you, Thomas.
Lutz
From: Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 24. March 2020 at 18:33
To: Lutz Schmidt <lutz.schmidt@sap.com>
Cc: "Doerr, Martin (martin.doerr@sap.com)" <martin.doerr@sap.com>, "Baesken, \
Matthias" <matthias.baesken@sap.com>, "hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.java.net" \
<hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: [CAUTION] RE: RFR(xxs): 8241395: Factor out platform independent code \
for os::xxx_memory_special()
Hi Lutz,
no special reason for the AIX case, I think our code there predated the other \
versions. I'll unify the messages as you suggested.
Thanks for the review.
..Thomas
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:03 PM Schmidt, Lutz \
<lutz.schmidt@sap.com<mailto:lutz.schmidt@sap.com>> wrote: Hi Thomas,
looks good to me in general.
Is there a reason why in os_aix.cpp there is an assert(false) in pd_reserve* and an \
unimplemented() in pd_release*? For the other OSes, there is a fatal(), if \
applicable.
In addition, I'd like to see the same failure text in either case.
No new webrev required.
Thanks,
Lutz
On 24.03.20, 16:31, "hotspot-runtime-dev on behalf of Doerr, Martin" \
<hotspot-runtime-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net> \
on behalf of martin.doerr@sap.com<mailto:martin.doerr@sap.com>> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
looks good to me, too.
In addition to the copyright, please improve indentation for the 2nd argument \
line in os_linux.cpp and os_windows.cpp: +char* os::pd_reserve_memory_special(size_t \
bytes, size_t alignment, char* req_addr, bool exec) {
and remove extra newline in os.cpp:
+ return result;
+
+ }
No need for a new webrev.
Best regards,
Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hotspot-runtime-dev <hotspot-runtime-dev-
> bounces@openjdk.java.net<mailto:bounces@openjdk.java.net>> On Behalf Of \
Baesken, Matthias > Sent: Dienstag, 24. März 2020 16:25
> To: Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe@gmail.com<mailto:thomas.stuefe@gmail.com>>; \
hotspot-runtime- > dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:dev@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: RE: RFR(xxs): 8241395: Factor out platform independent
> code for os::xxx_memory_special()
>
> Hi Thomas, looks good to me.
> But you might want to change the copyright year in
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8241395-refactor-reserve-
> memory-
> special/webrev.00/webrev/src/hotspot/share/runtime/os.hpp.frames.html
>
> Thanks, Matthias
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Thomas Stüfe
> <thomas.stuefe@gmail.com<mailto:thomas.stuefe@gmail.com><mailto:thomas.stuefe@gmail.com<mailto:thomas.stuefe@gmail.com>>>
> Date: Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 1:40 PM
> Subject: RFR(xxs): 8241395: Factor out platform independent code for
> os::xxx_memory_special()
> To: Hotspot dev runtime <hotspot-runtime-
> dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:dev@openjdk.java.net><mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.java.net>>>
>
> Hi,
>
> may I please have reviews for this little cleanup.
>
> A while ago we factored out platform independent behavior for
> os::reserve_memory() and friends to os.cpp and relegated platform
> dependent code to os::pd_reserve_memory() etc. This change does the
> same for os::reserve_memory_special() and os::release_memory_special().
>
> Only Linux and Windows are affected since only they have meaningful
> implementations for UseLargePages.
>
> It also adds a small comment about the NMT Tracker object.
>
> In addition it asserts - now for all platforms, it used to do this only on \
Linux - > that if both requested address and alignment are given to
> os::reserve_memory_special() the requested address should at least be
> aligned to the given alignment (the arguments should be mutually exclusive
> and I plan to clean this up further).
>
> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241395
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8241395-refactor-
> reserve-memory-special/webrev.00/webrev/
>
> Thanks, Thomas
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic