[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-hotspot-runtime-dev
Subject:    Re: [11] Request for sponsor to putback fix for JDK-8201509: Zero : S390 31bit (S390 and not _LP64) 
From:       Aleksey Shipilev <shade () redhat ! com>
Date:       2018-04-27 14:34:17
Message-ID: 7b4722bd-7653-c9a2-721c-da103c270ee8 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I'll do it.

In future, you don't need to start another thread for requests like these, you can just ask for the
sponsor in the same RFR thread at hotspot-dev@

-Aleksey

On 04/27/2018 04:19 PM, Chris Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like find a JDK11 committer to sponsor and putback this
> fix  :
> 
> JDK-8201509: Zero : S390 31bit (S390 and not _LP64) atomic_copy64 inline
> assembler is wrong
> 
> Bug:
>  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201509
> 
> WebRev:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chrisphi/JDK-8201509/webrev.3
> Changeset:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chrisphi/JDK-8201509/webrev.3/jdk.changeset
> 
> Review thread:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018April/031626.html
> 
> Testing: Builds itself on s390 31bit with some other local patches to
> avoid type mismatches.
> 
> Chris
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]