[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-hotspot-runtime-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR(xxs): 8144192: [windows] Enhancements to os::print_siginfo()
From:       Thomas_Stüfe <thomas.stuefe () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-11-30 6:52:36
Message-ID: CAA-vtUxMHKgbxootsN5htchcO9CBtNVBgdXvb-AQ9c75vSTQfw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi David,

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:12 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes@oracle.com>
wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 28/11/2015 1:31 AM, Thomas St=C3=BCfe wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> please take a look at these small enhancements to Windows' version of
>> os::print_siginfo.
>>
>> Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144192
>> Webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8144192-Enhancements-print_si=
ginfo/webrev.00/webrev/
>>
>
> I couldn't find any documentation to confirm that EXCEPTION_GUARD_PAGE ha=
s
> the same ExceptionInformation[0] as EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION and
> EXCEPTION_IN_PAGE_ERROR.
>
>
That is true. I found this in practice to be true, though. And useful
enough to add.
But this was some years ago, and since it is undocumented, it may not work
anymore. So, if you want, I can remove EXCEPTION_GUARD_PAGE from that case.

Kind Regards, Thomas


> Thanks,
> David
> -----
>
> Kind regards, Thomas
>>
>>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]