[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-hotspot-runtime-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR 8068730: Increase the precision of the implementation of java.time.Clock.systemUTC()
From:       Staffan Larsen <staffan.larsen () oracle ! com>
Date:       2015-01-16 11:46:47
Message-ID: B4547535-B536-4F63-A194-D3E9BE21F7A2 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


> On 13 jan 2015, at 13:26, David Holmes <david.holmes@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 13/01/2015 7:53 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> > On 13/01/15 04:52, David Holmes wrote:
> > > > Here is the new webrev with Stephen & your feedback included
> > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8068730/webrev.01/
> > > > 
> > > > (windows_time_stamp not renamed yet)
> > > 
> > > I checked the updated webrev.02 and everything looks good on the hotspot
> > > side.
> > > 
> > > What are your plans for pushing this?
> > 
> > Thanks David,
> > 
> > My understanding is that I'll need to push that through hs-rt - since
> > it has changes for hotspot. I believe I'll need two reviewers - is that
> > right? Roger Riggs has also reviewed the changes on core-libs-dev, so
> > is this good to go, or do both reviewers need to be members of the hsx
> > project?
> 
> hsx project is defunct, so technically we're all just jdk9 reviewers, but we still \
> like two reviews from hotspot team members.

I've looked at the hotspot changes: Looks good!

Thanks,
/Staffan

> 
> > Also - I am not sure whether I need a sponsor (I have never pushed
> > anything to hs-rt - I usually push in jdk9-dev) or whether I am
> > allowed to push this myself (I'll use jprt in that case).
> 
> If you are a jdk9 committer then you can push yourself via jprt - full forest \
> submission from top-level: "jprt submit -forest -testset hotspot" 
> David
> 
> > best regards,
> > 
> > -- daniel
> > 
> > > 
> > > David
> > > -----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]