[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-graal-dev
Subject:    Re: Java 8 bytecode to ptx
From:       Bahram Yarahmadi <bahram.yarahmadi () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-02-16 11:49:21
Message-ID: CAFtewT33qKaNpYCCJ=pr0FSs0K075fxOpCmkfAq6PZLDiqR1Mw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks,
It seems they don't work on ptx backend anymore as Christian said
Is it possible to work on Ptx backend ? if I apply the changeset,will my
code be inconsistent ?
I read all documents thar Raffaello suggeted to me but they were not so
straight forward.
for my purpose Do I have to modify the code in graal-compiler and rebuild
the project again ?

*Thanks,*

*Bahram*

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Christian Thalinger <
christian.thalinger@oracle.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Tom Rodriguez <tom.rodriguez@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> We pulled all of that code out of Graal a while back.  It's all still
> there in the mercurial history though.
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/graal/graal-compiler/rev/8f2fb6bec986 is the
> major changeset removing the code.
>
>
> Yes, that's the one I wanted to pull over into
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/sumatra/sumatra-dev/
>
>
> tom
>
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Christian Thalinger <
> christian.thalinger@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 4:15 AM, Bahram Yarahmadi <bahram.yarahmadi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
> I'm involved in research project .I want to run Java 8 new features like
> lambdas with stream API on GPUs (I'm interested much in Nvidia
> GPUs)(Something similar to project sumatra)
>
>
> Why don't you just use Project Sumatra?  A very basic implementation of
> the PTX backend is already there.
>
> Btw. that reminds me that I promised to Xerces that I would push the last
> Graal version which supported GPUs to the Sumatra
> repository…
>
> I've done a lot of research  but all of them were useless. for example I
> wanted to translate Java Bytecode to LLVM IR with openjdk shark JIT but
> becouse of Lack of support in Invocedynamic in shark that solution was a
> waste of time.
> Now I want to use Graal ,
> I want to know your idea ,Is it possible ?
> I have downloaded Graal from its repo and now I'm working on it.
>
> Special thanks in advance for your suggestions
>
> Bahram,
>
>
>
>
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]