[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-core-libs-dev
Subject:    RE: [RFR] 8205525 : Improve exception messages during manifest parsing of jar archives
From:       "Baesken, Matthias" <matthias.baesken () sap ! com>
Date:       2018-07-31 10:28:01
Message-ID: 252b3b00f4e94b8796256675ce2571b1 () sap ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello ,
looks like  the  generalization of  the `includeInExceptions` security   property   \
is now in jdk/jdk  after

"8207846: Generalize the jdk.net.includeInExceptions security property"
   
was added, great news  and thanks to Chris for driving this !

I use this security property now as well , and updated the  change :

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8205525.3/

I updated the CSR as well :

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207768


Best regards, Matthias



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty@oracle.com>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018 14:54
> To: Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman@oracle.com>; Baesken, Matthias
> <matthias.baesken@sap.com>
> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> <goetz.lindenmaier@sap.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFR] 8205525 : Improve exception messages during manifest
> parsing of jar archives
> 
> 
> > On 19 Jul 2018, at 11:46, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On 19/07/2018 09:07, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> > > Hello, in the meantime I  prepared a CSR :
> > > 
> > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207768
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > jdk.includeInExceptions expands the scope. That might be okay but we
> > > > will need to re-visit jdk.net.includeInExceptions and also move the
> > > > support to somewhere in jdk.internal so that it can be used by other
> > > > code in java.base.
> > > Is there some support code for  " jdk.net.includeInExceptions "    or do
> you just  mean  the name of the property ?
> > > 
> > Chris is right that it's a bit premature to submit a CSR while the question on
> whether to rename the existing security property is on the table. I have no
> objection to doing that.
> 
> I filed the following issue to generalize the `includeInExceptions` security
> property:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207846
> 
> I would like to resolve 8207846 first, then 8205525 can propose to add the
> new argument value, `jarPath`.
> 
> -Chris.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]