[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-compiler-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR 6388543: improve accuracy of source positions for AnnotationValue param of Messager.printMes
From:       Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibbons () oracle ! com>
Date:       2017-02-07 2:05:01
Message-ID: 58992B4D.3010509 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

reviewed, built, tested and pushed

-- Jon

On 02/06/2017 05:51 PM, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> Thanks for the review! I fixed the nits, here's the latest version:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/6388543/webrev.02/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecushon/6388543/webrev.02/>
> 
> The changeset is attached.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Jonathan Gibbons 
> <jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com <mailto:jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/06/2017 10:45 AM, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> > Hi, have you had a chance to look at the latest version of the
> > patch?
> > 
> > And would it make sense to defer to 10?
> > 
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Liam Miller-Cushon
> > <cushon@google.com <mailto:cushon@google.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
> > <jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com
> > <mailto:jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > Is there any good reason not to do so?
> > 
> > 
> > I don't think so, thanks. I had thought that it would add
> > implementation complexity and wasn't as obviously useful as
> > supporting top-level and array elements values. However I
> > realized that matchAnnoToTree can be generalized to search
> > recursively for values, so it ends up being simpler. And as
> > you point out, it offers the best flexibility.
> > 
> > I have uploaded a new version of the patch that searches
> > recursively:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/6388543/webrev.01/
> > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecushon/6388543/webrev.01/>
> > 
> > 
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/6388543/webrev.01/test/tools/javac/processing/messager/6388543/T6388543.java.html
>  <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecushon/6388543/webrev.01/test/tools/javac/processing/messager/6388543/T6388543.java.html>
>                 
> Nit: in the @modules, you don't need to specify java.compiler as
> well as jdk.compiler, since the latter requires the former.
> Nit: it is not common to see javax.* imports sorted before java.*
> imports.
> 
> Otherwise, looks OK.
> 
> I think this is small and safe enough for 9.
> 
> -- Jon
> 
> 


[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    reviewed, built, tested and pushed<br>
    <br>
    -- Jon<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/06/2017 05:51 PM, Liam
      Miller-Cushon wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAL4Qsgu24BzVmgYmuBf3=Y6tVz3OPxFN5Brd2qNAVOKOz=zRpQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Thanks for the review! I fixed the nits, here's the
        latest version:
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecushon/6388543/webrev.02/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/6388543/webrev.02/</a></div>
  <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>The changeset is attached.</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:40 PM,
          Jonathan Gibbons <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com" \
target="_blank">jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com</a>&gt;</span>  wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class=""> <br>
                <br>
                <div class="m_-8357567548030413821moz-cite-prefix">On
                  02/06/2017 10:45 AM, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:<br>
                </div>
              </span>
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">Hi, have you had a chance to look at
                      the latest version of the patch?
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>And would it make sense to defer to 10?</div>
                    </div>
                    <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at
                        3:37 PM, Liam Miller-Cushon <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:cushon@google.com"
                            target="_blank">cushon@google.com</a>&gt;</span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
                          0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                          solid;padding-left:1ex">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div class="gmail_extra"><span>
                                <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 12,
                                  2017 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Gibbons <span
                                    dir="ltr">&lt;<a
                                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                                      href="mailto:jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com"
                                      \
target="_blank">jonathan.gibbons@oracle.com</a>&gt;</span>  wrote:<br>
                                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                                    style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                                    0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                                    rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Is
                                    there any good reason not to do so?</blockquote>
                                </div>
                                <br>
                              </span>I don't think so, thanks. I had
                              thought that it would add implementation
                              complexity and wasn't as obviously useful
                              as supporting top-level and array elements
                              values. However I realized that
                              matchAnnoToTree can be generalized to
                              search recursively for values, so it ends
                              up being simpler. And as you point out, it
                              offers the best flexibility.</div>
                            <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                            </div>
                            <div class="gmail_extra">I have uploaded a
                              new version of the patch that searches
                              recursively:</div>
                            <div class="gmail_extra"><a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                \
                href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecushon/6388543/webrev.01/"
                                \
target="_blank">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cu<wbr>shon/6388543/webrev.01/</a></div>  \
</div>  </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="m_-8357567548030413821moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecushon/6388543/webrev.01/test/tools/javac/processing/messager/6388543/T6388543.java.html"
  target="_blank">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~<wbr>cushon/6388543/webrev.01/test/<wbr>tools/javac/processing/<wbr>messager/6388543/T6388543.<wbr>java.html</a><br>
  Nit: in the @modules, you don't need to specify
              java.compiler as well as jdk.compiler, since the latter
              requires the former.<br>
              Nit: it is not common to see javax.* imports sorted before
              java.* imports.<br>
              <br>
              Otherwise, looks OK.<br>
              <br>
              I think this is small and safe enough for 9.<br>
              <br>
              -- Jon<br>
              <br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic