[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-2d-dev
Subject:    Does AWT always use it's own version of bad_alloc?
From:       Julian Waters <tanksherman27 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2022-07-28 5:18:26
Message-ID: CAP2b4GMsuVy5eqhBgaPb-_vmOgN1AT3501KfZvyJOy1iiHLZJw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Sorry if this is a bit of a silly question, but does awt.dll on Windows
always use it's own definition of bad_alloc from alloc.h, even if compiled
in debug mode? Or does it use the standard library implementation in
certain configurations? (new operator, etc) Asking since I'm not
particularly well versed with libawt, and the header inclusions are a
little confusing.

best regards,
Julian

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Sorry if this is a bit of a silly question, but does \
awt.dll on Windows always use it&#39;s own definition of bad_alloc from alloc.h, even \
if compiled in debug mode? Or does it use the standard library implementation in \
certain configurations? (new operator, etc) Asking since I&#39;m not particularly \
well versed with libawt, and the header inclusions are a little \
confusing.<div><br></div><div>best regards,</div><div>Julian</div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]