[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-2d-dev
Subject:    Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [PATCH] support Mongolian and FVS(Mongolian Free Variation Selector)
From:       Nakajima Akira <nakajima.akira () nttcom ! co ! jp>
Date:       2018-06-27 0:02:46
Message-ID: ba826f81-92cc-f3b7-b502-1871c79176b4 () nttcom ! co ! jp
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Steven.

I understood your concern.
Your concern is reasonable.
I will leave it to your decision.

Thanks.
Akira Nakajima


On 2018/06/27 1:37, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
> I would like to get some more review. Many experts met last week to
> discuss the model further, and there was a 3 day intense meeting earlier
> this year. I'm very hesitant to recommend a change in implementation at
> this instant in time.
>
> S
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:53 PM Nakajima Akira
> <nakajima.akira@nttcom.co.jp <mailto:nakajima.akira@nttcom.co.jp>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Steven.
>
>     ========================================================
>     https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2018/18168-script-rec.pdf
>     from Page.2
>     "The entire model for Mongolian is still under discussion"
>     ========================================================
>
>     Thanks for giving me information.
>     I don't know when Mongolian model will be fixed (1 year, 2 years, or
>     later...).
>
>     Anyway, Windows and FireFox display Mongolian in current unicode ver.
>     But Java does not display about Mongolian glyph transformation.
>
>     I guess that it is better to make it possible to display as same as
>     Windows/FireFox.
>
>     This patch seems to display as same as Windows/FireFox.
>     And this patch's modification depends on harfbuzz.
>     Please anyone let me know expected trouble by applying this patch.
>
>
>     Win10 and Mongolian Art Font.
>     NotePad
>     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mnTWh1OIKSUQI3xaTM3OXemqtAbMScSS
>     IE11
>     <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mnTWh1OIKSUQI3xaTM3OXemqtAbMScSSIE11>
>     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kCEZAo7YfQfcXXGkPlsCzYdVnHvzPoSy
>     FireFox60
>     <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kCEZAo7YfQfcXXGkPlsCzYdVnHvzPoSyFireFox60>
>     https://drive.google.com/open?id=17knR5oEMWdZr9kffJDrl9oB98biFo1hq
>
>
>      >  and I posted  to GoogleDrive that TestMongolian.java ScreenShots of
>      > before/after applying this patch
>      > <NG - before>
>      > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aha8xamB44f5XY6RrKYrI9t9czQuuoU2
>      > <OK - after>
>      > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1e_oxCcoHNJQPgbEFEq9tiCEapwbWqm8j
>
>
>     Thanks.
>     Akira Nakajima
>
>
>     On 2018/06/22 1:14, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
>     > There is much discussion about the encoding of Mongolian- see
>     > https://www.unicode.org/L2/topical/mongolian/
>     >
>     > Is this discussion taken into account?
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]