[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openjdk-2d-dev
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFC: Fix for JDK-8188030
From: Philip Race <philip.race () oracle ! com>
Date: 2018-06-12 16:46:23
Message-ID: df1363f1-02df-8620-165d-0b076c344d3b () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
OK . go ahead .. I just keep failing to get to this.
I think we will have to use a follow-up bug in the eventuality
of remaining issues on Oracle JDK8u.
-phil.
On 6/11/18, 8:23 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> I realise this is quite an old thread, but do you think I can request
> the proposed patch [1] for backport to 8?
>
> We've been shipping it in our RPMs for some time but I think it would
> be much nicer to have this upstreamed for all to consume.
>
> Cheers,
> Mario
>
> [1]http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Phil Race<philip.race@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Sorry .. but there may be more work needed on 8 that I forgot about.
>> But its for Oracle JDK to account for the fact that CFF fonts are still
>> being excluded there.
>>
>> In a nutshell .. if we end up with zero fonts as a result .. just add the
>> Oracle JDK's Lucida Sans
>> as slot 0 font so that there is SOMETHING.
>>
>> However I know you can't test this .. since you don't have that font.
>>
>> So if you'd prefer to stick to what you can test I'd quite understand and
>> we'd handle that part separately.
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>>
>> On 11/15/2017 09:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Phil Race<philip.race@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Mario,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please request 8 backport approval for this version (which I have
>>>> approved as below)
>>>>
>>>> I know some internal folks who like to see it in 8 as well and I had to
>>>> tell
>>>> them you already have a fix for 8 in hand ..
>>>>
>>>> The jdk-updates project is only for 9+ so the usual old 8 rules should
>>>> apply
>>>> for this.
>>> Right, I was sidetracked by that discussion but this is on my list,
>>> I'm preparing the backport request as we speak.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mario
>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
OK . go ahead .. I just keep failing to get to this.<br>
I think we will have to use a follow-up bug in the eventuality<br>
of remaining issues on Oracle JDK8u.<br>
<br>
-phil.<br>
<br>
On 6/11/18, 8:23 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJwKKmbFy2FCbwkZEYo+EtGAHCDPO3D0UyGW8Gj=7xfWMU5WoA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Phil,
I realise this is quite an old thread, but do you think I can request
the proposed patch [1] for backport to 8?
We've been shipping it in our RPMs for some time but I think it would
be much nicer to have this upstreamed for all to consume.
Cheers,
Mario
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eneugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/</a>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Phil Race <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" \
href="mailto:philip.race@oracle.com"><philip.race@oracle.com></a> wrote: </pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Sorry .. but there may be more work needed on 8 that I forgot \
about. But its for Oracle JDK to account for the fact that CFF fonts are still
being excluded there.
In a nutshell .. if we end up with zero fonts as a result .. just add the
Oracle JDK's Lucida Sans
as slot 0 font so that there is SOMETHING.
However I know you can't test this .. since you don't have that font.
So if you'd prefer to stick to what you can test I'd quite understand and
we'd handle that part separately.
-phil.
On 11/15/2017 09:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Phil Race <a \
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" \
href="mailto:philip.race@oracle.com"><philip.race@oracle.com></a> wrote: </pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Mario,
Can you please request 8 backport approval for this version (which I have
approved as below)
I know some internal folks who like to see it in 8 as well and I had to
tell
them you already have a fix for 8 in hand ..
The jdk-updates project is only for 9+ so the usual old 8 rules should
apply
for this.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Right, I was sidetracked by that discussion but this is on my \
list, I'm preparing the backport request as we speak.
Cheers,
Mario
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic