[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-2d-dev
Subject:    Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Backport of JDK-8041501?
From:       Stefan Fuchs <snfuchs () gmx ! de>
Date:       2016-01-27 19:29:47
Message-ID: 56A91AAB.5000004 () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

the installation issue with jdk 9 is still unresolved, but we tested the 
backport with the 8u76 b04 early access version.
The bug is fixed and the images from our customer now look fine.

Looking forward for the release of 8u76 in April.

Thank you for your effort,

Stefan



Stefan Fuchs wrote:
> Thank you for pointing me to the correct list.
>
> I would have certainly liked to confirm, that the bug is really fixed.
> Unfortunately neither current jdk 9 b100 nor b99 will install on my 
> machine or on the one of my colleague.
>
> We think we are affected by 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146756.
> I would have commented on the issue, but I have no account on 
> bugs.openjdk.java.net.
>
> I'll report back, when the installation issue has been resolved.
>
> - Stefan
>
>
>
> Phil Race wrote:
>> [removing core-libs]
>>
>> 1) Yes 2d is the right list.
>>
>> 2) Yes, I think we can back port this although it would be nice if first
>> you find a way to confirm it actually fixes the observed problem by 
>> trying
>> a 9 build with the fix .. that would be jdk 9 b100 being posted soon 
>> I hope.
>> Right now it is still b99 : https://jdk9.java.net/download/
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>>
>> On 1/7/2016 2:53 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>> I suspect 2d-dev is the right mailing list.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Stefan Fuchs <snfuchs@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I don't know, if this is the correct mailinglist, but one of our 
>>>> customers
>>>> was recently hit by
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041501.
>>>>
>>>> Would it be possible to backport the fix to Java 8 ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>    Stefan
>>
>>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]