[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openjdk-2d-dev
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] 7u25 kills 'blit' performance for any custom ColorModel class
From: Phil Race <philip.race () oracle ! com>
Date: 2013-07-27 2:01:36
Message-ID: 51F32A00.9040702 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
> Can you set my expectations
ok ..
There won't be any remedy in 7u40. Its 99% baked.
Beyond that I don't know and can't make promises since work would have to be
done and I don't have any release schedule - even though I would love
to improve this.
Also remember this is a forum for people who are *contributing* fixes &
changes,
not a support forum.
If you have a fix that might work and doesn't compromise security,
please propose
it - assuming you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement.
-phil.
On 7/26/13 2:52 PM, Keith Kriewall wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Can you set my expectations for if/when this problem will be fixed? We can't \
> upgrade past 7u21 until this gets corrected, or we find some kind of workaround. \
> Right now I can't envision a workaround for a Web Start environment.
> Thanks,
>
> -Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Race [mailto:philip.race@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:47 AM
> To: Keith Kriewall
> Cc: '2d-dev@openjdk.java.net'
> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] 7u25 kills 'blit' performance for any custom \
> ColorModel class
> This is an unfortunate consequence of a fix a potential security issue.
> The actual bug ID for this is 8019590. We'll take a look to see what can be done.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 7/2/2013 10:13 AM, Keith Kriewall wrote:
> > Hi 2d Devs,
> >
> > The addition of BufferedImage.isStandard() has absolutely killed
> > drawing performance for our application. BufferedImage types that used
> > to be set to optimized types (e.g. TYPE_INT_BGR) are now set to
> > TYPE_CUSTOM, due solely to the classloader used to load the class. It
> > appears that unless we load our subclasses of ColorModel via the
> > bootclassloader, we're stuck. I've posted 9004714 to Oracle's bug
> > database with a test app.
> >
> > Can anyone on this list comment on this change in 7u25, provide a
> > workaround, and/or provide a fix to bug 9004714 for future 7u releases?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Keith
> >
> > *Keith Kriewall*
> > Software Developer
> > 705 5^th Ave S, Suite 1100
> > Seattle, WA 98104 USA
> > 206-217-7892
> > keith.kriewall@attachmate.com <mailto:keith.kriewall@attachmate.com>
> > Description: line
> > Description: Attachmate <http://www.attachmate.com/>
> >
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic