[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openid-user-experience
Subject: Re: Draft OpenID 2.x User Experience working group charter
From: jDavid <jdavid.net () gmail ! com>
Date: 2010-06-02 17:42:31
Message-ID: AANLkTimZ6gL353HmJWdgtukhhvHaD0v9A1fRUFg72kn5 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
If your point is to do with UX, a guideline on contextually appropriate
terms would be useful? (I agree) Is that your point?
'yes'
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
> One would hope that the author of a TOS or any other document will use
> terms appropriate for the audience.
>
> This is the specs list, and we (identity experts) all should know what an
> RP is. I see zero value in renaming it for the spec.
>
> If your point is to do with UX, a guideline on contextually appropriate
> terms would be useful? (I agree) Is that your point?
>
> On 2010-06-02, at 10:01 AM, jDavid wrote:
>
> my point is that if you write up a TOS, or some other specific verbiage you
> are going to right now use the term 'relying party', and until you know the
> details of OpenID, relying party is meaningless.
>
> Facebook uses the term 'partner website'
> http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/108
>
> Let's get simpler, clearer, and more human friendly.
>
> Ubuntu has been doing a great job of cleaning little things like this up.
> They have set a goal to be easier to use than Mac OSX, it's a lofty goal,
> but it's a good one. Open Technologies don't need to be complicated to be
> open, let's prove that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2010-06-02, at 9:22 AM, jDavid wrote:
>>
>> > no, but if i tell my grandma, mom, brother or dad that the relying party
>> is going to do something with her data, what is she to assume?
>>
>> Well, I would be telling them specific sites and not use the term relying
>> party. Similarly I would not be using the term OpenID Provider.
>>
>> >
>> > it's not a good noun. social app is better but i am sure it's not the
>> best.
>>
>> Do you think that we should only use OpenID for social apps?
>>
>> > let's just try to find something meaningful. i also think relying
>> party makes more sense with browser redirects, than with how OpenID could
>> work.
>>
>> If the OP is a server, I don't see how you get away from redirects. I also
>> don't understand why you think that makes more sense.
>>
>> >
>> > 3rd party site would be a more commonly used noun set.
>>
>> Who is the 1st and 2nd party?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Justin Kruger --
> Unity Technologies ( unity3d.com)
> Social Media Software Engineer -
> San Francisco, CA
>
> http://jDavid.net
> http://twitter.com/jdavid
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid
>
> jDavid.net@gmail.com
>
> jdavid
>
> http://untemplater.com/
> MANIFESTO - "Create True Happiness Living a life that you Consciously
> Choose for Yourself."
>
>
>
--
--
Justin Kruger --
Unity Technologies ( unity3d.com)
Social Media Software Engineer -
San Francisco, CA
http://jDavid.net
http://twitter.com/jdavid
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid
jDavid.net@gmail.com
jdavid
http://untemplater.com/
MANIFESTO - "Create True Happiness Living a life that you Consciously Choose
for Yourself."
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<meta charset="utf-8">If your point is to do with UX, a guideline on contextually \
appropriate terms would be useful? (I agree) Is that your \
point?<div><br></div><div>'yes'<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun \
2, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Dick Hardt <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:dick.hardt@gmail.com">dick.hardt@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> \
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">One would hope that the \
author of a TOS or any other document will use terms appropriate for the \
audience.<div> <br></div><div>This is the specs list, and we (identity experts) all \
should know what an RP is. I see zero value in renaming it for the spec. \
</div><div><br></div><div>If your point is to do with UX, a guideline on contextually \
appropriate terms would be useful? (I agree) Is that your point?</div> \
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><br><div><div>On 2010-06-02, at 10:01 AM, jDavid \
wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite">my point is that if you write up a TOS, or \
some other specific verbiage you are going to right now use the term 'relying \
party', and until you know the details of OpenID, relying party is \
meaningless.<div> <br></div>
<div>Facebook uses the term 'partner website'</div><div><a \
href="http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/108" \
target="_blank">http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/108</a></div><div><br></div><div>Let's \
get simpler, clearer, and more human friendly.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Ubuntu has been doing a great job of cleaning little things like \
this up. They have set a goal to be easier to use than Mac OSX, it's a lofty \
goal, but it's a good one. Open Technologies don't need to be complicated \
to be open, let's prove that.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM, \
Dick Hardt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dick.hardt@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">dick.hardt@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><br>
On 2010-06-02, at 9:22 AM, jDavid wrote:<br>
<br>
> no, but if i tell my grandma, mom, brother or dad that the relying party is \
going to do something with her data, what is she to assume?<br> <br>
</div>Well, I would be telling them specific sites and not use the term relying \
party. Similarly I would not be using the term OpenID Provider.<br> <div><br>
><br>
> it's not a good noun. social app is better but i am sure it's not the \
best.<br> <br>
</div>Do you think that we should only use OpenID for social apps?<br>
<div><br>
> let's just try to find something meaningful. i also think relying party \
makes more sense with browser redirects, than with how OpenID could work.<br> <br>
</div>If the OP is a server, I don't see how you get away from redirects. I also \
don't understand why you think that makes more sense.<br> <div><br>
><br>
> 3rd party site would be a more commonly used noun set.<br>
<br>
</div>Who is the 1st and 2nd party?<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>-- <br>Justin Kruger -- <br>Unity \
Technologies ( <a href="http://unity3d.com/" \
target="_blank">unity3d.com</a>)<br>Social Media Software Engineer - <br>San \
Francisco, CA<br> <br><a href="http://jDavid.net/" \
target="_blank">http://jDavid.net</a><br> <a href="http://twitter.com/jdavid" \
target="_blank">http://twitter.com/jdavid</a><br><br><a \
href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid" \
target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid</a><br><br><a \
href="mailto:jDavid.net@gmail.com" target="_blank">jDavid.net@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>jdavid <br> <br><a href="http://untemplater.com/" \
target="_blank">http://untemplater.com/</a><br>MANIFESTO - "Create True \
Happiness Living a life that you Consciously Choose for Yourself."<br> </div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br \
clear="all"><br>-- <br>-- <br>Justin Kruger -- <br>Unity Technologies ( <a \
href="http://unity3d.com">unity3d.com</a>)<br>Social Media Software Engineer - <br> \
San Francisco, CA<br><br><a href="http://jDavid.net">http://jDavid.net</a><br><a \
href="http://twitter.com/jdavid">http://twitter.com/jdavid</a><br><br><a \
href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid">http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid</a><br> \
<br><a href="mailto:jDavid.net@gmail.com">jDavid.net@gmail.com</a><br><br>jdavid <br> \
<br><a href="http://untemplater.com/">http://untemplater.com/</a><br>MANIFESTO - \
"Create True Happiness Living a life that you Consciously Choose for \
Yourself."<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________
user-experience mailing list
user-experience@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-user-experience
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic