[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/15] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request
From:       "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield () gmail ! com>
Date:       2022-04-30 21:35:01
Message-ID: CADkTA4M6NzCMVtEhiu+Hyaqp4gMZViP1XRH1qP1t2Ds3S6TL1w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:26 AM Bruce Ashfield via
lists.openembedded.org
<bruce.ashfield=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 4:02 PM Bruce Ashfield via
> lists.openembedded.org
> <bruce.ashfield=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:41 AM Bruce Ashfield via
> > lists.openembedded.org
> > <bruce.ashfield=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 7:51 AM Richard Purdie
> > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 09:47 -0400, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Richard,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is mainly a resend of the pull request that I sent just before
> > > > > the release builds.
> > > > >
> > > > > At that time, there was a ppc boot issue, which I've fixed. There was
> > > > > also a ptest warning, which I couldn't reproduce, so let's see if it
> > > > > pops back up on the AB.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is also a known issue with some of the arm reorganization done
> > > > > for the -tiny cleaup. Jon has been working on fixes to that series, and
> > > > > I've cc'd him here so he can add context. It was some boot issues,
> > > > > even in the -standard kernel for sato (last I checked).
> > > > >
> > > > > The issue with the ARM changes is that they've already been pushed
> > > > > to my repos, so everything stacks on top. If we can't get them fixed
> > > > > shortly, I can temporarily revert and do a new patch on top.
> > > > >
> > > > > Khem has also indicated that the 5.15.36 -stable has all of the changes
> > > > > required for gcc12, so it would be a good bump to get under test.
> > > >
> > > > The testing says this is mostly good with two issues. Firstly, strace ptests are
> > > > regressing:
> > > >
> > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/81/builds/3435
> > > > and I suspect:
> > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/82/builds/3188
> > > > will too when it finishes.
> > > >
> > > > There was another patch causing other ptest failures so I had to do a second
> > > > pass but I think the strace issue above is from a kernel change.
> > >
> > > I'll see about running the strace locally today. Hopefully it pops up
> > > here so I can debug.
> >
> > FYI: I have the landlock test case passing here, there's just an
> > output difference from the kernel. The test is passing.
>
> I have located the exact kernel commit that changed the output, hence
> why the test is failing.
>
> strace upstream hasn't adjusted yet, so I'll spin up a patch, and get
> send patches to the list over the weekend.

The two patches that fix the strace ptest fail, and qemuarm graphical
boot are on the list.

Bruce

>
> Bruce
>
> >
> > I had two other strace tests fail, but they look like OOMs/resource
> > problems, and they don't show up on the autobuilder, so I'm going to
> > ignore them for now.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Secondly, qemuarm graphics fails:
> > > >
> > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/53/builds/5132
> > > >
> > > > I did try adding Jon's other qemuarm patches:
> > > >
> > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/53/builds/5136
> > > >
> > > > and it still fails. I've not looked further as yet, just reporting what the
> > > > varoious combinations of patches in testing showed.
> > >
> > > Yep, Jon has indicated that he still has more patches to come, but my
> > > queue is unfortunately blocked on them, unless we take that breakage
> > > or I do a revert of the first series.
> > >
> > > I'll wait another day or so, and will do the revert after that.
> > >
> >
> > I have your suggested patch under test, but that build is still running.
> >
> > I'll follow up over the weekend with the strace + qemuarm
> > configuration changes onto the end of my queue.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> > > thee at its end
> > > - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> > thee at its end
> > - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end
> - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
>
> 
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#165075): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/165075
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90753174/4454766
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [openembedded-core@marc.info]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]