[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf: Ensure XZ_THREADS doesn't change sstate checksums
From:       "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie () linuxfoundation ! org>
Date:       2021-09-30 9:47:52
Message-ID: 38f7a46fd43f411aedcf622891cab8985f9f9130.camel () linuxfoundation ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 08:50 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> Wouldn't "0" be a better default? Setting threads to "0" will make xz use the 
> CPU count anyway, so it'd be honest too.

On some systems we have this set to a specific value rather than auto so any
value is potentially dishonest. I think I went for "1" as it was clearly the
least likely and more obvious when looking at the sig files to see if it was
working.

At the end of the day it doesn't really matter as long as it is a specific
value.

Cheers,

Richard



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#156489): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156489
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85529700/4454766
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [openembedded-core@marc.info]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic