[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    Re: [OE-core] RFC [v2]: Make kernel upgrades via dnf work like on Red Hat
From:       "Zoltan Boszormenyi via lists.openembedded.org" <zboszor=pr.hu () lists ! openembedde
Date:       2021-09-29 17:29:59
Message-ID: 720e9092-19d6-c045-b080-d568e533dd3f () pr ! hu
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2021. 09. 29. 18:06, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:34 AM Zoltán Böszörményi <zboszor@pr.hu> wrote:
>>
>> I have observed two issues when upgrading to kernel versions
>> successively.
>>
>> One is that when installonly_limit is reached in dnf, only the
>> main kernel package was removed. Patch 1 fixes this by adding
>> extra RDEPENDS to the kernel subpackages on the main kernel package.
>> This circular dependency helps dnf to remove all subpackages.
>>
>> dnf.conf settings "installonlypkgs", "installonly_limit" and
>> others are documented at https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/conf_ref.html
>>
>> The second issue is that when the oldest kernel version is
>> removed by dnf, the /boot/bzImage symlink is also gone.
>>
>> Fix this by using update-alternatives instead of hardcoded ln -s
>> and rm -f. This is configurable via a new variable.
> 
> I'll comment on patch 2/2 directly, but I have a few things here as well.
> 
>>
>> This is only an RFC at this point, because
>> 1) The first fix is only applied in the KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES=0 case,
>>     it may need its own knob or applied unconditionally.
> 
> What is the outcome of the circular dependency you mention in patch
> 1/1 ? Does DNF warn, or something else ? What do the other package
> managers do when the circular dependency is detected ?

No warning, it's just that the dnf transaction looks like this:

# dnf --disablerepo="*" install kernel-*
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
  Package                     Architecture    Version        Repository     Size
================================================================================
Installing:
  kernel                      intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline  6.4 k
  kernel-5.14.8               intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline   48 k
  kernel-image-5.14.8         intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline  6.6 k
  kernel-image-bzimage-5.14.8 intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline  9.1 M
  kernel-modules-5.14.8       intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline   53 M
Removing:
  kernel                      intel_corei7_64 5.14.5-r0.0    @@commandline  88
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  5 Packages
Remove   1 Packages
Total size: 75 M
Is this ok [y/N]:

instead of:

# dnf --disablerepo="*" install kernel-*
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
  Package                     Architecture    Version        Repository     Size
================================================================================
Installing:
  kernel                      intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline  6.4 k
  kernel-5.14.8               intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline   48 k
  kernel-image-5.14.8         intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline  6.6 k
  kernel-image-bzimage-5.14.8 intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline  9.1 M
  kernel-modules-5.14.8       intel_corei7_64 5.14.8-r0.0    @commandline   53 M
Removing:
  kernel                      intel_corei7_64 5.14.5-r0.0    @@commandline  88
Removing dependent packages:
  kernel-5.14.5               intel_corei7_64 5.14.5-r0.0    @@commandline 222 k
  kernel-image-5.14.5         intel_corei7_64 5.14.5-r0.0    @@commandline   0
  kernel-image-bzimage-5.14.5 intel_corei7_64 5.14.5-r0.0    @@commandline 9.2 M
  kernel-modules-5.14.5       intel_corei7_64 5.14.5-r0.0    @@commandline  52 M
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  5 Packages
Remove   5 Packages
Total size: 75 M
Is this ok [y/N]:

Since the dependency matches the exact version via ${EXTENDPKGV},
I would expect other package managers to do what dnf is doing.

At least, IIRC, opkg built with libsolv does.

> But yes, I agree that we really don't want any more conditional code
> in the kernel packaging, since it isn't going to get tested. So
> whatever we do needs to work on all package managers and with or
> without kernel module splitting.
> 
>>
>> 2) There's an extra issue I found while implementing the second patch:
>>     instead of using KERNEL_VERSION, I had to resort to using PV
>>     because the former is dynamically set via a python function
>>     and it changes its value at some point between build phases.
>>     AFAIK, there are kernel recipes out there using only the major
>>     version with two numbers in PV instead of the full version triplet.
>>     I can live with this as my kernel recipe uses the version triplet.
>>
>> 3) The new knob name for patch #2 is KERNEL_IMAGEDEST_USE_UPDATE_ALTERNATIVES.
>>     It is admittedly too chatty, it can be renamed if someone suggests
>>     a better name.
> 
> I'll ponder this as well, but nothing is immediately coming to mind.
> 
> Bruce
> 
>>
>> Please advise how to fix and make it final so these fixes can be
>> accepted into openembedded-core.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Zoltán Böszörményi
>>
>>
> 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#156472): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156472
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85942508/4454766
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [openembedded-core@marc.info]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]