[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-runtime: do_check should execute before do_build
From:       bkylerussell () gmail ! com
Date:       2021-07-31 2:37:54
Message-ID: CAFrQVPOA+Pni3SNSBuHRMXLTA4Q29KVrStXN2OFJM1S0N7XHyA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


I see. I had forgotten that the autobuilders don't run do_check as part of
the normal build.

We have a customization in our distro layer to run do_check on normal
builds. Internally, we use that as a hook to allow per-package test suites
to fail our integration pipeline during our normal builds. Maybe there's a
way we can prevent this conflict with rm_work from our own layer.

Sorry for the confusion,

Kyle


On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, 5:06 PM Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 14:16 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote:
> > This will result in a behavior change, making it so `bitbake
> gcc-runtime` will
> > run the check task. Are there implications to this?
>
> We definitely do not want to do that. This is used to run the testsuite
> which
> isn't part of a normal build.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="auto"><div>I see. I had forgotten that the autobuilders don&#39;t run \
do_check as part of the normal build.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div \
dir="auto">We have a customization in our distro layer to run do_check on normal \
builds. Internally, we use that as a hook to allow per-package test suites to fail \
our integration pipeline during our normal builds. Maybe there&#39;s a way we can \
prevent this conflict with rm_work from our own layer.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div \
dir="auto">Sorry for the confusion,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div \
dir="auto">Kyle</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, 5:06 PM Richard Purdie &lt;<a \
href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 14:16 -0700, \
Christopher Larson wrote:<br> &gt; This will result in a behavior change, making it \
so `bitbake gcc-runtime` will<br> &gt; run the check task. Are there implications to \
this?<br> <br>
We definitely do not want to do that. This is used to run the testsuite which<br>
isn&#39;t part of a normal build.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Richard<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#154292): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154292
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84557001/4454766
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [openembedded-core@marc.info]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]