[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openembedded-core
Subject: [OE-core] Should the devmem2 recipe move to oe-core?
From: philip () balister ! org (Philip Balister)
Date: 2015-11-30 14:26:40
Message-ID: 565C5CA0.9020906 () balister ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On 11/30/2015 02:09 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>> I was poking at the layer index and ran across this:
>>
>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=devmem
>>
>> The recipe appears in 4 layers.
>>
>> Should we just move it to openembedded-core?
>
> The busybox version appears to be better maintained (it's gained
> support for 64bit data types, which is still missing from the
> original), so maybe better to recommend the busybox version instead.
I think there is "some issue" with the busybix version, possibly related
to automatic readback after write. I'll ask around.
Philip
>
>> I wonder how easy it would
>> be to have the layer index report duplicate recipes?
>>
>> Philip
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic