[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    [OE-core] Should the devmem2 recipe move to oe-core?
From:       philip () balister ! org (Philip Balister)
Date:       2015-11-30 14:26:40
Message-ID: 565C5CA0.9020906 () balister ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/30/2015 02:09 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>> I was poking at the layer index and ran across this:
>>
>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=devmem
>>
>> The recipe appears in 4 layers.
>>
>> Should we just move it to openembedded-core?
> 
> The busybox version appears to be better maintained (it's gained
> support for 64bit data types, which is still missing from the
> original), so maybe better to recommend the busybox version instead.

I think there is "some issue" with the busybix version, possibly related
to automatic readback after write. I'll ask around.

Philip

> 
>> I wonder how easy it would
>> be to have the layer index report duplicate recipes?
>>
>> Philip
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic