[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-multilib-config: Tweak naming of options to match gcc's expectations
From:       richard.purdie () linuxfoundation ! org (Richard Purdie)
Date:       2015-07-31 10:27:45
Message-ID: 1438338465.22462.11.camel () linuxfoundation ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

gcc itself does not add the '-' of options to its multilib configuration.
We should follow its example.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-multilib-config.inc \
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-multilib-config.inc index bdf4be7..f7f9f55 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-multilib-config.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-multilib-config.inc
@@ -208,7 +208,8 @@ python gcc_multilib_setup() {
         whitelist = (d.getVar("MULTILIB_OPTION_WHITELIST", True) or "").split()
         for i in tune_parameters['ccargs'].split():
             if i in whitelist:
-                opts.append(i)
+                # Need to strip '-' from option
+                opts.append(i[1:])
         options.append(" ".join(opts))
 
         if tune_baselib == 'lib':


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]