[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openejb-user
Subject:    Re: Bug? 2 Apps in Tomme 1.6.0 with same name EJB not deploy second App
From:       Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-04-16 8:28:50
Message-ID: CACLE=7PjOe76yYvy8GmZTwreuC=JuBRxZQ9XuCqyfzUm6ADZGw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

sure, push a mail on the list but not sure why we wouldn't do it ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-04-16 10:27 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
> Then, it's perfect.
> Changing the default should maybe be discussed?
>
> JLouis
>
>    --
>     Jean-Louis Monteiro
>     http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>     http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> syst prop is already here so just the default needs to be adjusted.
>>
>> Can even be done in default system.properties, it is commented today
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-16 9:28 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>:
>> > I wouldn't say rare actually.
>> > I mean, now (since Java EE 6) we have collapsed EAR, nobody cares about
>> EAR
>> > nightmare, but sometimes they want to share the same business logic on 2
>> > webapps. So that occurs I think.
>> >
>> > Definitely, we could do the opposite which is:
>> > - remove old names by default
>> > - add a system property to bind them again if needed
>> >
>> > That would allow TomEE to always work out of the box and users to keep
>> some
>> > kind off compatibility if needed.
>> >
>> >
>> >    --
>> >     Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> >     http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> >     http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> or just change the default.
>> >>
>> >> That said deploying the same ejb in two apps is actually rare so not
>> >> sure we really need to handle it by default.
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-04-16 9:19 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com
>> >:
>> >> > We should probably add a sys prop (if it does not already exists) to
>> de
>> >> > activate the old JNDI names.
>> >> > Isn't it?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) no
>> >> >> 2) no
>> >> >> 3) yes http://tomee.apache.org/jndi-names.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> that's inheritance of old names we keep for compatibility
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2014-04-16 4:32 GMT+02:00 Luis Castro <luis_castro@animotion.com.mx
>> >:
>> >> >> > Hello.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Environment TOMEE 1.6.0 and OpenEJB Provided
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >     <dependencies>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >         <!-- tomee-->
>> >> >> >         <dependency>
>> >> >> >             <groupId>org.apache.openejb</groupId>
>> >> >> >             <artifactId>apache-tomee</artifactId>
>> >> >> >             <version>1.6.0</version>
>> >> >> >             <classifier>webprofile</classifier>
>> >> >> >             <type>zip</type>
>> >> >> >             <scope>provided</scope>
>> >> >> >         </dependency>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >     Use Case 1#
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Name aplication "App One" ;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "App One" have the class EJB  "UsuariosFacadeLocal" in package
>> >> >> > com.appone.businesslayer.ejbs.local
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Code Example :
>> >> >> > package com.appone.businesslayer.ejbs;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > import com.appone.businesslayer.ejbs.local.UsuariosFacadeLocal;
>> >> >> > import javax.ejb.Stateless;
>> >> >> > import javax.ejb.TransactionManagement;
>> >> >> > import javax.ejb.TransactionManagementType;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > @Stateless
>> >> >> > @TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.CONTAINER)
>> >> >> > public class UsuariosFacade implements UsuariosFacadeLocal {
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >     @Override
>> >> >> >     public String hello() {
>> >> >> >         return this.getClass().getCanonicalName();
>> >> >> >     }
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And deployed and run successful
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Another app inside  same server Tomee 1.6.0
>> >> >> > Name aplication "App Two" ;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "App TWO" have the class EJB  "UsuariosFacadeLocal" in package
>> >> >> > com.apptwo.businesslayer.ejbs.local
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And deployed and run ERROR:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Grave: Application cannot be deployed as it contains deployment-ids
>> >> which
>> >> >> > are in use: app: /home/programacion/animotion
>> >> >> > app/App1/target/AppOne-1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >> >> > abr 15, 2014 8:48:12 PM
>> org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler
>> >> >> > createApplication
>> >> >> > Grave: DeploymentId already used: UsuariosFacade
>> >> >> > abr 15, 2014 8:48:12 PM
>> org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomcatWebAppBuilder
>> >> >> > startInternal
>> >> >> > Grave: Unable to deploy collapsed ear in war
>> >> >> >
>> >>
>> StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[/AppOne]
>> >> >> > org.apache.openejb.DuplicateDeploymentIdException: Application
>> cannot
>> >> be
>> >> >> > deployed as it contains deployment-ids which are in use: app:
>> >> >> > /home/programacion/animotion app/App1/target/AppOne-1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >> >> >     UsuariosFacade
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I can solved this situation with add anotation "name" in second App
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > @Stateless(name = "UsuariosFacadeAppTwo")
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > in EAR must not have the same class names, I understand. ,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > But in 2 different app?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Questions:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) Its Bug ?
>> >> >> > 2) I am making a mistake in the specification?
>> >> >> > 3) Should this be possible? 2 app, 2 different EJB class
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Attached project, if needed to reproduce the situation
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Sorry for google traductor,
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >    --
>> >> >     Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> >> >     http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> >> >     http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >>
>>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]