[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openejb-user
Subject:    Re: JPA 2.0 and Java EE 6: all at once? In pieces?
From:       Laird Nelson <ljnelson () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-03-02 1:36:31
Message-ID: 2c0ebf0c1003011736o6c954c89qb29343146376a96f () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Great; thanks.

Best,
Laird

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <
lfpg.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's already a roadmap for EJB 3.1 at
> http://openejb.apache.org/ejb-31-roadmap.html
> Persistence is handled by OpenJPA, and it's already about to release
> OpenJPA 2.0 beta2, so it'll probably be the first implemented part of Java
> EE 6.
>
> Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
>
> > Hello; I'm wondering what the community's approach is going to be to
> bring
> > OpenEJB 3.1.x up to Java EE 6 compliance (in the realm of the EJB
> container
> > at least).
> >
> > I am asking not because I feel I'm owed anything but because it sure
> would
> > be great if, at a minimum, javax.persistence were brought up to 2.0
> level.
> >
> > Is there a plan for how OpenEJB 3.1 will move towards Java EE 6
> compliance?
> >
> > May I lobby for JPA 2.0 first, even if, for example, things like
> > PersistenceUnitInfo.getValidationMode() return NONE to start?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Laird
> >
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]