[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openejb-development
Subject:    Re: Drop dbcp2 for TomEE 9 / 10?
From:       Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonteiro () tomitribe ! com>
Date:       2023-05-26 11:39:22
Message-ID: CAPkio3EmMRkAXkAfuSnYershGcS+7S3Sw4LUT8zj-jSQ_W0Drw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


The problem with open source is that you don't really get to know what
feature is really used and what's not. That being said. I don't mind if we
remove in 10. If we have specific request. We can add it back?

WDYT?

Le ven. 26 mai 2023, 13:33, Richard Zowalla <richard@zowalla.com> a =C3=A9c=
rit :

> Hi all,
>
> it seems that dbcp2 has no real intention to provide us with "real"
> jakarta packages. If we want to drop the shade artifact in TomEE 9 /
> 10, we would need to drop our dbcp2 integration (or stick with the
> shading).
>
> Do we have any good reason to keep it in TomEE 9 / 10? Otherwise, -
> based on Romains comment below - I am inclined to just drop it? Wdyt?
>
>
> Gru=C3=9F
> Richard
>
> -------- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> Antwort an: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> An: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?
> Datum: Fri, 26 May 2023 12:20:59 +0200
>
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > TomEE can drop managed package legacy dependency now, was kept while
> > the
> > replacement was in test in 1.x version but makes years it is no more
> > relevant and no more the default (since we switched to tomcat-jdbc).
> > So no big deal if dbcp wants to drop it on TomEE side IMHO.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-perfor
> > mance>
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 26 mai 2023 =C3=A0 12:19, Richard Zowalla <rzo1@apache.org> a
> > =C3=A9crit :
> >
> > > The current TomEE codebase still uses classes from the "managed"
> > > package of dbcp2. (Thus, we are shading it for TomEE 9 / 10)
> > >
> > > We might be able to drop that integration at some point but
> > > currently
> > > our focus is on getting a EE10 milestone out of the door, so I
> > > don't
> > > think, that it is a theoretical issue.
> > >
> > > Gru=C3=9F
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, dem 26.05.2023 um 12:08 +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> > > > Le 11/05/2023 =C3=A0 15:56, Richard Zowalla a =C3=A9crit :
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > do we have any updates?
> > > > >
> > > > > How can I help to get a dbcp version supporting Jakarta
> > > > > namespace?
> > > > >
> > > > > Emmanuel outlined a possible appraoch. How can we move forward
> > > > > with
> > > > > it?
> > > >
> > > > I'm tempted to merge the dual-javax-jakarta branch, but Romain's
> > > > comment
> > > > about TomEE no longer using the managed package made me wonder if
> > > > we
> > > > really need to bother at all.
> > > >
> > > > Are we trying to fix a theoretical issue or are there actual
> > > > users of
> > > > these classes expecting a fix?
> > > >
> > > > Emmanuel Bourg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ----
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]