[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openejb-development
Subject:    Re: Release TomEE 9.1.0
From:       Richard Zowalla <rzo1 () apache ! org>
Date:       2023-05-23 8:42:47
Message-ID: 30944ba8799d313c7ba0decb4852bc5c913db6b6.camel () apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Short update: JL did some fixes on the TCK setup and the TCK looks
good. Bug fixes and dep upgrades did not introduce any regression.

There is a full build running to include the final version of
arquillian (1.7.0.Final) + Jackson 2.15.1 (with some bug fixes included
in 2.15.0). If this is included, we are in good shape for 9.1.0, imho.

WDYT?

Gruß
Richard


Am Dienstag, dem 16.05.2023 um 11:58 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Thanks. I will do the backport and prepare a API release for VOTE.
> 
> Gruß
> Richard
> 
> 
> Am Dienstag, dem 16.05.2023 um 11:42 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis
> Monteiro:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I reviewed and merged the PR. Go ahead with the API release and
> > place
> > backport to 10.x so we don't introduce the issue again.
> > I did not close the issue as fixed for that reason.
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:02 AM Richard Zowalla <rzo1@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I provided a possible fix for TOMEE-4199 via [1]. If it is
> > > sufficient,
> > > we can do an api release and proceed with 9.1.0 (after we have
> > > some
> > > tck
> > > results).
> > > 
> > > Gruß
> > > Richard
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api/pull/2
> > > 
> > > Am Dienstag, dem 18.04.2023 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis
> > > Monteiro:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > Looks like our backlog is starting to grow. We've done quite a
> > > > lot of
> > > > updates and I was wondering if we should do a release for
> > > > 9.1.0?
> > > > 
> > > > Note that there is an issue to fix before with the API Uber jar
> > > > where
> > > > the
> > > > tomcat classifier has the same content as the non tomcat
> > > > classifier.
> > > > This
> > > > was meant to not be the case, so in Tomcat we would use the API
> > > > jars
> > > > Tomcat
> > > > is providing.
> > > > 
> > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4199
> > > > 
> > > > Regards
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > 
> > > 
> 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]