[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openejb-development
Subject: Re: Trunk beta release
From: David Blevins <david.blevins () gmail ! com>
Date: 2011-08-30 0:47:25
Message-ID: 8924E6D7-8714-4026-9C32-E629926AF47F () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
It would be great if we could release 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT. Transaction failure getCause() is a long awaited feature.
On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:35 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Forward this to geronimo community too.
>
> Do we want to pick up the fixes in Geronimo Connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT for
> coming geronimo 3.0 beta release ?
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Swapped over to Geronimo connector 3.1 - most stuff looks ok, but the
>> TransactionRollbackCauseTest unit test fails with this earlier version. We
>> had previously upgraded to 2.2.2-SNAPSHOT to support the rollback cause:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1097964 - I then
>> upgraded to 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT after that.
>>
>> What's the view here - should we go for 3.1 and change/comment out the test
>> until a newer connector is published, or is it preferably to try and get a
>> newer version of the connector published.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll give trunk a try with connector 3.1.1 today and report back. I did a
>>> fair bit of work on the connector support in openejb, and just went for
>> the
>>> latest snapshot of geronimo connector at the time. I think 3.1.1 will
>>> probably be fine.
>>>
>>> If everyone is happy then I'll kick of the release process for a beta
>> once
>>> xbean is published. Please shout if there's any problem with that.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>> On Aug 27, 2011 2:13 AM, "Shawn Jiang" <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is
>>>> connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT a must-have ?
>>>>
>>>> can we use connector 3.1.1 for the openejb beta for now ?
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:11 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Trunk beta release
>>>> To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is
>>>> connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be great to get some kind of alpha/beta/milestone
>>> release
>>>>> out.
>>>>>
>>>>> We deliberately keep the examples on a different version number to
>>> openejb,
>>>>> as there shouldn't be any dependency there, but we create an examples
>>> zip
>>>>> at
>>>>> release time as well as everything else I believe.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not too sure about javaee-api - obviously it follows the javaee
>>>>> version.
>>>>> My guess is we could choose to push that at the same time as the
>>> everything
>>>>> else as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we'd need xbean and geronimo connector publishing first.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to volunteer to do the release work, if that's any help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>> On Aug 26, 2011 7:15 AM, "Shawn Jiang" <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Anyway, let's start to do this and figure how rough the trunk is
>> step
>>> by
>>>>>> step. the first step would be to clean the snapshot depencencies up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <xbeanVersion>3.8-SNAPSHOT</xbeanVersion>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> <org.apache.openwebbeans.version>1.1.1-SNAPSHOT</org.apache.openwebbeans.version>
>>>>>>
>>> <geronimo.connector.version>3.1.1-SNAPSHOT</geronimo.connector.version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are also some internal compoents that are using different
>>> version
>>>>> then
>>>>>> 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <javaee-api.version>6.0-SNAPSHOT</javaee-api.version>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> some samples in trunk are using 1.1-SNAPSHOT, But I can find part of
>>> them
>>>>>> are still 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure what's the pratice to release javaee-api and samples
>> when
>>>>> they
>>>>>> don't share the same version with trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Blevins <
>>> david.blevins@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suspect that even if we get started now, it will still be a few
>>> weeks
>>>>>>> before we see anything. It's been over a year on trunk with no
>>> release.
>>>>>>> It's going to be rough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best case scenario, we get two releases out before October. Worst
>>> case
>>>>>>> scenario, we wait too long to start and don't get any.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't know if geronimo can wait until javaone. We could release a
>>>>>>> openejb
>>>>>>>> m1/beta1, and then release a m2/beta2 for javaone.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> maybe we should wait just before javaone?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Romain
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2011/8/26 Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Geronimo is going to make a beta release. Let's discuss a
>> openejb
>>>>>>>>> trunk
>>>>>>>>>> release again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Blevins <
>>>>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would be excellent if we could get a beta ready before this
>>>>>>>>> presentation
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> the 25th:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.oscon.com/oscon2011/public/schedule/detail/20105
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Might be kind of tight, but ideally there would be at least
>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>> for people to download and play with.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Shawn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Shawn
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic