[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openejb-cvs
Subject:    [jira] Updated: (OPENEJB-1144) @Stateful javax.ejb.AccessTimeout
From:       "Thiago Veronezi (JIRA)" <jira () apache ! org>
Date:       2010-05-31 23:45:38
Message-ID: 20503117.95091275349538845.JavaMail.jira () thor
[Download RAW message or body]


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel \
]

Thiago Veronezi updated OPENEJB-1144:
-------------------------------------

    Attachment: OPENEJB-1144.patch

I needed to create 2 extra classes. I didnt get the system working with a common \
class for both annotations (Stateful and Access timeout) because of the XmlType \
annotation of the xml dataholder field. For statefultimeaout we have \
"stateful-timeoutType", and for accesstimeout we have "access-timeoutType"...

+@XmlType(name = "stateful-timeoutType", propOrder = { "timeout", "unit" })
+@XmlType(name = "access-timeoutType", propOrder = { "timeout", "unit" })

The unittest was accusing "two fields with the same name".

************************************************

For this first patch, the system is going to support only one value for \
accesstimeout, instead of the list, as discussed by email. If thats ok, we need to \
open a new issue to complete this feature to support a list.


> @Stateful javax.ejb.AccessTimeout 
> ----------------------------------
> 
> Key: OPENEJB-1144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1144
> Project: OpenEJB
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ejb31
> Reporter: David Blevins
> Attachments: OPENEJB-1144.patch
> 
> 


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]