[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-tech
Subject:    Re: Split rtinit()
From:       Martin Pieuchot <mpieuchot () nolizard ! org>
Date:       2013-08-29 9:20:56
Message-ID: 20130829092056.GA30143 () figo ! nolizard ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 27/08/13(Tue) 10:44, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to
> > unify the various code paths to add and delete route entries.  The 
> > diff below is a first step, it splits rtinit() into rt_add() and
> > rt_delete() there should be no functional change.
> > 
> > ok?
> 
> That makes soooo much more sense. :-).

mikeb@ pointed out that the names I picked were maybe too generic.  This
kept me thinking and I'd like to try to separate the logic of adding a
route to network vs route to host first.

In other words, forget this diff for the moment (:

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic