[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-tech
Subject:    Re: ipv6 atomic draft -> rfc6946 diff
From:       Claudio Jeker <cjeker () diehard ! n-r-g ! com>
Date:       2013-08-22 21:15:58
Message-ID: 20130822211558.GC32338 () diehard ! n-r-g ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft?
> 

The RFC actually mentions that OpenBSD-current as of 2012 is following the
specification so I think this is OK.

> 
> On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 23:40:12 -0700 (-0700), Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> :Hi,
> :
> :The draft is now an RFC.
> :Perhaps the code should reflect those changes as well ?
> :
> :
> :Index: sys/netinet6/frag6.c
> :===================================================================
> :RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/frag6.c,v
> :retrieving revision 1.47
> :diff -u -p -r1.47 frag6.c
> :--- sys/netinet6/frag6.c        11 Jun 2013 18:15:54 -0000      1.47
> :+++ sys/netinet6/frag6.c        22 Aug 2013 06:36:35 -0000
> :@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ frag6_input(struct mbuf **mp, int *offp,
> :        offset += sizeof(struct ip6_frag);
> : 
> :        /*
> :-        * draft-gont-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-00:  A host that receives an
> :+        * RFC6946:  A host that receives an
> :         * IPv6 packet which includes a Fragment Header with the "Fragment
> :         * Offset" equal to 0 and the "M" bit equal to 0 MUST process such
> :         * packet in isolation from any other packets/fragments.
> :
> 
> -- 
> It's better to be wanted for murder than not to be wanted at all.
> 		-- Marty Winch
> 

-- 
:wq Claudio

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]