[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-ports
Subject:    Re: security support
From:       "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide () sacrideo ! us>
Date:       2009-03-31 14:07:38
Message-ID: 200903311407.n2VE7c7g030618 () onyx ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

Ian,

	From kaosagnt@tpg.com.au Tue Mar 31 09:08:59 2009
	From: Ian McWilliam <kaosagnt@tpg.com.au>
	To: "ports@openbsd.org" <ports@openbsd.org>
	Subject: Re: security support

	[...]

        Just what grabs peoples fancy with regard -stable ports???

I would say that proper security/stability-only patches sent to
ports@ would go a long way, without putting the burden on anyone
beside the maintainers of the ports. That may be hard for each
maintainer, but at least the work is somewhat distributed. Later,
if someone wants to maintain the -STABLE branch of the CVS tree,
well, that's well and good.

Not every maintainer would have to do this either, but it would be
nice if they did. ;-)

-- 
Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> | <http://www.sacrideo.us>
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to
live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastiat
+++++++++++++++ ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) ++++++++++++++

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]