[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-ports
Subject:    Re: [new] shmux
From:       Olivier Cherrier <oc () symacx ! com>
Date:       2008-03-28 16:41:28
Message-ID: 20080328164128.GD27000 () symacx ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:16:14PM +0100, gaston@gcu.info wrote:
> 
> And it seems that it has fping as a hidden RUN_DEPENDS (use -P switch),
> but wh ship it as only executable by root..

Yes, shmux can use fping; i was aware of it. (Frankly, I use shmux
without fping for more than 2 years without any trouble.)
To make it fully functional, you are right, fping has to be a
dependancy.

> Also, i'd prefer ALL_TARGET=shmux for the sake of clarification, and
> also REGRESS_TARGET=test to have make regress happy.
> Simon@ pointed out that PERMIT_DISTFILE_CDROM could be set to no, as
> clause (1) speaks about 'reasonable fee'.. but anyway we don't ship
> distfiles on CDROM. I'm not a licence expert, but this licence scares me. 
> Landry
 
OK, it is done.
Could you please have a look?

Thanks,
Later.

-- 
Olivier Cherrier
mailto:oc@symacx.com

["shmux.taz" (shmux.taz)]

WsFWW8$@&JѢ#c
V1WYɍu?(voFvߵ؊
 |@p*;<Od^UeEa]Vc̹e$t>@Jr9߾IdVĿ&Uke \
M,IMWPV+⯩4><#$)	,N]R"̣"'C(WȋYƐ		II@DIC4;D9\CZXBut
 @B<\8WG4#>'#ږ<I4Őf^Jw)
tq%y5{RqSRP-)T؏̏#8Z)\BVh
%ي樂܇!
e`e-\@H.Ђ>?"'-I$c_coPUeSRO	/leho \
j	S?Zgp˽?y&Pc$|'tBWdsď7x:Ex*EHnV܃G^ \
ɢ$b6tLKO{MeM'v[.ެjc7wruRiYxq~UNu \
sપڝ|ePq?2ދrռP9}ऽP@NSʱ\UG>e:YkuU+'
 xh7wv-=?n
P`QaBKqwd76y&F<ֻ˲Q,Tgb7@llN]}fR|*MeOEo[x \
?yO_VhGa3!|!EY1')s:d{BӐ7.ݡЪyB2ǣWaAߞ`6G0vco.suUL6	Df?
 !p\FhCG <g&X["1x[qлVstTp w. \
k*UOwP<i1y'KhPςy6hD4wMlY[7cFY.Lnalv$Q9: \
g0[]|<1x6a|\:#ymMQ*Hn*G?KG|<xq^X|qr\ObxJJ(QD%J(QD%JOīT(




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic