[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-ports
Subject:    Teapop  bump to latest version
From:       "Rod.. Whitworth" <listen () witworx ! com>
Date:       2006-01-28 8:59:59
Message-ID: 200601281959.2829598.6 () mail ! witworx ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Back on 2004/03/02 I sent an email to the maintainer of
ports/mail/teapop as qupoted below.

I guess you could say it is a maintainer timeout. <big evil g]rin> The
update is such a simple one that I don't need a fix in the tree - I
<have> the data needed to be up to date.

Some new users may not.

What is the appropriate way to deal with this?

<quote mail to maintainer>
Thanks to your very clean port of Teapop it was easy to bring it up to
date for my new server by just changing the version # in the makefile
and doing a make fetch so I could generate the hashes before doing a
make package.

Here is the content of distinfo now:
MD5 (teapop-0.3.8.tar.gz) = c322c20018663a1a9b7860966cbd4ed2
RMD160 (teapop-0.3.8.tar.gz) = fce3606748c33bd71134c09d8bb3e65aaabcdfa3
SHA1 (teapop-0.3.8.tar.gz) = 33632cc34148d88408bcb9afa5433c1a103f3cf5

I don't know what, if anything, is needed to complete a port update or
I would have sent you diffs but it is so clean that it is hardly saving
you much work.


Thanks for the original.
</quote>

Kick it in or forget it. The release notes make it clear that it is a
good idea to update:
0.3.8   + Allow port to listen to in standalone to be changed with -P.
  (Patch by: "Malte S. Stretz" <msquadrat.nospamplease@gmx.net>)
! Reduce memory footprint
  (Idea from: "Malte S. Stretz" <msquadrat.nospamplease@gmx.net>)
+ Warn when teapop.passwd isn't found and default authentication
  is used.
+ Introduce softlock, which gives the client an empty mailbox
  instead of an error.
- Proper handling of CRLF in Maildirs.
  (Found by: Matthew Sayler <sayler@speedsite.com>)
* Release date: 25-Nov-2003
<end release note>


From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?

Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.






[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]