[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-misc
Subject:    Re: pfsync0 doesn't starts
From:       "C. L. Martinez" <carlopmart () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-11-28 7:58:26
Message-ID: CAEjQA5+ZQ+=B1KxZirApX3-FvYLfs9SGoa9eqZXE2UgxQ6Bs3Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:12 PM, andy <andy@brandwatch.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:31:49 +0000, "C. L. Martinez"
> <carlopmart@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:25 PM, andy <andy@brandwatch.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:08:33 +0000, "C. L. Martinez"
>>> <carlopmart@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>  I am doing some tests with two openBSD 5.4 hosts configuring carp
>>>> features. All it is ok, except for pfsync0 interface: it doesn't
>>>> starts up at system boot or when both are rebooted. I need to start it
>>>> manually every time.
>>>>
>>>> cat /etc/hostname.pfsync0
>>>> up syncdev em3
>>>
>>> Do you also have;
>>> cat /etc/hostname.em3
>>> inet 192.168.0.252 255.255.255.0
>>> up
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Yes, interface em3 is up ..
>
> If you have an 'up' in your /etc/hostname.em3 file, and your pfsync0 looks
> right, have you try running /etc/netstart to correct the permissions on
> your files.
> Other than that I don't know.. I've not heard of pfsync not starting at
> all before. It always starts without issue for us (albeit slowly).
> I have known it to take over 60 seconds after rebooting a box for pfsync
> to go up properly and for the carp demotion counters to come all the way
> down. I figured that was just due to various pfsync timers and the time
> taken to get the boxes in sync.

Thanks Andy. I have found the problem. I am doing these tests without
PF enabled. After enabling PF, pfsync0 interface is up and all works
ok.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic