[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbsd-misc
Subject:    Re: mailx : mime handling?
From:       "Anthony J. Bentley" <anthony () cathet ! us>
Date:       2013-09-28 6:57:18
Message-ID: 13396.1380351438 () cathet ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

Predrag Punosevac writes:
> hruodr@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Predrag Punosevac <punosevac72@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > > > I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot
> > > > live without it.
> > > > 
> > > NetBSD version of mailx does support threading as well
> > >
> > > http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?mailx++NetBSD-current
> > >
> > > and it does have the right license :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Predrag
> >
> > Heirloom mailx also supports threads and has BSD license. Who wants such an
> > mailx, can install the port. If you make from OpenBSD mailx a mailx
> > similar to heirloom mailx, then there will be no small mail client
> > anymore.
> 
> I would suggest that you compare man pages for Heirloom mailx and NetBSD
> version of mailx. Heirloom mailx does so much more than attachments and
> threading. It is still the smallest fully featured MUA in existance.
> 
> To be frank with you I was checking your claim about Heriloom license. 
> Makefile has indeed this line
> #BSD
> I would sware that it was custom license but you might be actually right
> on that one. I was wondering if William Yodlowsky can confirm licensing.

If we're talking about s-nail, yes, it is BSD-licensed.
cd /usr/ports/mail/s-nail && make extract
then look at the individual source files under WRKOBJDIR.
Of course, there are several small bits (MD5, etc) that are external
contributions.

-- 
Anthony J. Bentley

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]