[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openbox
Subject:    [openbox] Update openbox wiki
From:       general () musically ! me ! uk (General)
Date:       2020-08-16 9:39:37
Message-ID: 20200816103937.2850fe72 () devuan
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, 09 Aug 2020 16:40:12 +0300
"D.T." <ohnonot-github at posteo.de> wrote:

>And some rant: yes, more and more people do this now with more and more
>software: "it hasn't received an updated in a year, it must be bad!"
>Or worse: "Openbox never had a security audit! It is insecure!" (LOL)
>Those that think that software is only good when its maintainers use
>the newest Web 2.0 platforms to advertise itself and constantly
>generate "updates" - probably shouldn't be using openbox anyhow.

While I agree with this, maybe for such a mature product an occasional
confirmation/status message wouldn't go amiss, something like "Openbox V(nn)
tested OK dd/mm/yyyy"

-- 
Never start a jigsaw puzzle in a room full of people with nothing better to do!

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]